Problem Set 2

MSU EC 410

Prof. Ahlin

due

2

/

1

9

/

1

5

1

.

Consider a country in which Y = 200 K

2/5

N

3/5

. Assume in this country they save 20% of

their income, population grows at 3% per year, and depreciation of capital occurs at 10% per

year. Use the Solow

model.

a.

Compare the effectiveness of i) a 50% increase in the savings rate (to 30%), ii) a 67% decline

in the population growth rate (to 1%), and iii) a 10% increase in productivity (to 220). That is,

for each, give the percent by which it increases lon

g

–

run average income (

y

*

)

and long

–

run

average consumption (

c

*

).

b.

Give one policy each that could be undertaken to accomplish i)

–

iii).

W

hich

policy has the

greatest impact

on long

–

run well

–

being

(assuming

each policy has

zero costs)

?

2

.

Imagine the fol

lowing goal of Lenin/Stalin at the beginning of the Soviet regime in Russia: to

overtake (i.e. equal) and surpass the world’s industrialized economies in terms of GDP per

capita. To achieve this goal, the main instrument of control is the fraction of nati

onal production

that is devoted to building the nation’s productive capacity: new machines, factories,

transportation equipment, and roads (i.e. investment as a share of GDP). The rest of national

production is used for consumer items like clothing and fo

od. The country begins with relatively

little capital, being mostly rural and non

–

industrialized. Assume each of the following:

·

GDP per capita starts in Russia at $300/year.

·

The world’s industrialized economies start with GDP per capita of $5000/year.

·

Po

pulation growth rates are 2% everywhere in the world.

·

All capital depreciates at 8% per year.

Assume the basic growth framework of Solow. Further assume

y

= 400

k

1/3

in Russia.

a.

Solve for Soviet long

–

run GDP per capita

(

y

*

)

as

a function of its savings rate.

For parts b.

–

d., assume long

–

run GDP per capita equals $10,000 in the industrialized countries,

and that they are saving 10% of income.

b.

What fraction of national output should be devoted by the Soviet Union to building n

ew

capital goods in order to overtake, i

.

e.

equal

, the industrialized nations’ GDP per capita in the

long

–

run? What fraction is left for consumer items?

c.

What fraction of national output should be devoted by the Soviet Union to building new

capital good

s in order to surpass, i

.

e.

double

, the industrialized nations’ GDP per capita in the

long

–

run? What fraction is left for consumer items?

d.

In the long run, what is the ratio of Soviet GDP per capita to GDP per capita in the

industrialized countries, a

nd what is the ratio of Soviet consumption per capita to consumption

per capita in industrialized countries if the Soviet Union achieves the goal of part b? of part c?

(That is, find four ratios.)

e.

Comparing the outcomes of part d. of this question to the same question answered using the

Harrod

–

Domar model (5e. from problem set 1), which model produces a more optimistic outlook

for achieving, by saving and investing at high rates, the Soviet goals of

overtaking and

surpassing industrialized countries’ living standards? Remember that living standards are best

measured by consumption here.

3.

a.

Use the Solow model to determine the a) instantaneous impact on GDP per capita, b)

instantaneous impact on

consumption per capita, c) impact on long

–

run GDP per capita, d)

impact on long

–

run consumption per capita, e) impact on long

–

run GDP per capita growth rate,

and f) impact on long

–

run GDP growth rate

of a

one

–

time and instantaneous increase in the

populat

ion N

t

, through wartime refugee immigration, say.

Assume the country begins at its

steady state value of

k

*

before this event occurs. Justify your answer by use of graph and/or

equation.

[Hint: this should not be considered a change in n, since the population continues to

grow at rate n after the one

–

time jump; it should be modeled as a one

–

time jump in N

t

.]

b.

Graph the path of

y

t

and

c

t

against time for the event analyzed in part a.

c.

U

se the Harrod

–

Domar model to determine the a) instantaneous impact on GDP per capita, b)

instantaneous impact on consumption per capita, c) impact on long

–

run GDP per capita growth

rate, and d) impact on long

–

run GDP growth rate of a

one

–

time and instantan

eous increase in the

population N, through wartime refugee immigration, say.

Justify your answer by use of graph

and/or equation.

d.

Graph the path of

y

t

and

c

t

(or ln

y

t

and ln

c

t

, which are typically linear) against time

for the

event analyzed in part c

.

4.

Discuss

whether, to what extent, and why the following are true or false. (Adapted from Ray

ch. 3, exercise 8.)

a.

The Harrod

–

Domar model predicts that a country’s long

–

run per capita growth rate

depends

on its rate of savings, whereas the Solow mod

el predicts that it does not.

b.

According to both the Harrod

–

Domar and Solow models, if total factor productivity (i.e. A) is

higher

in one country than in another, the country with the higher productivity will see faster

long

–

run growth in GDP per capita

.

c.

The Solow model predicts that a change in the population growth rate affects neither the

long

–

run growth rate of GDP nor the long

–

run growth rate of GDP per capita.

d.

In the Solow model, output per capita (

y

) goes down as capital per capita (

k

)

increases,

because of diminishing returns.

e.

Both the Solow and the Harrod

–

Domar model point to the inadequacy of GDP per capita (i.e.

y

) as a measure of well

–

being

Basic features

- Free title page and bibliography
- Unlimited revisions
- Plagiarism-free guarantee
- Money-back guarantee
- 24/7 support

On-demand options

- Writer’s samples
- Part-by-part delivery
- Overnight delivery
- Copies of used sources
- Expert Proofreading

Paper format

- 275 words per page
- 12 pt Arial/Times New Roman
- Double line spacing
- Any citation style (APA, MLA, Chicago/Turabian, Harvard)

Delivering a high-quality product at a reasonable price is not enough anymore.

That’s why we have developed 5 beneficial guarantees that will make your experience with our service enjoyable, easy, and safe.

You have to be 100% sure of the quality of your product to give a money-back guarantee. This describes us perfectly. Make sure that this guarantee is totally transparent.

Read moreEach paper is composed from scratch, according to your instructions. It is then checked by our plagiarism-detection software. There is no gap where plagiarism could squeeze in.

Read moreThanks to our free revisions, there is no way for you to be unsatisfied. We will work on your paper until you are completely happy with the result.

Read moreYour email is safe, as we store it according to international data protection rules. Your bank details are secure, as we use only reliable payment systems.

Read moreBy sending us your money, you buy the service we provide. Check out our terms and conditions if you prefer business talks to be laid out in official language.

Read more
The price is based on these factors:

Academic level

Number of pages

Urgency