Question: How has our inaptitude in construction and balbutiation encircling investigation contributed to our noncommunication of or-laws construction, and how can we start to fix this amount?

Assignment: Use Carl Sagan’s “Can We Know the Universe? Reflections on a Grain of Salt” (p. 727) and Sherry Turkle's’ “How Computers Change the Way We Think” (p. 721), as well-mannered-mannered as another period of your select and any other instrument you conceive requisite to adjust an oration addressing this inquiry.  Your oration must be a restriction of 1000 articulation, in MLA format, and emsubstance in-text citations and a suitably formatted Works Cited page. 

During the attraction, you may use any instrument you brought delay you, including books, notes, your computer, your phone, etc. 

You may collaborate delay other community in the admission, but you are obligatory for congeniality your own oration, and anything copied from one special to another obtain outcome in twain parties receiving a enfeebled action. Use your collaborator to bounce ideas off of and to test decipher.

Other than inquirys encircling the inquiry for this exam, you may not ask the pedagogue for acceleration or feedback uniformly the exam has begun. 

Your oration obtain be actiond on the following:

Does it include a brawny subject declaration?

Is that subject declaration sufficiently explored in the substance of the oration?

Has the writer used sufficient attraction parallel delay firm forced to patch the dispute of the subject declaration?

Does the dispute enucleate throughout the race of the oration?

Does the oration transition smoothly from apex to apex?

Does the insertion seize the decipherer’s notice?

Does the disposal in-effect haul disposals encircling the dispute of the subject?

Are the MLA format, in-text citations, and Works Cited page all done suitably? 

Is the oration loose from errors in expression, spelling, and punctuation?