Assignment Instructions: 

1. Compare summative and formative evaluations. 
2. Justify processological choices of a separated grounds collation process. 
3. Communicate through letter that is pointed, balanced, and logically unembarrassed.

Refer to the 2009 life condition "Measuring Change in a Short-Term Educational Program Using a Retrospective Pretest Design" by Moore and Tananis. 

- Examine and Evaluate Moore and Tananis's findings about the use of retrospective grounds.

- Discourse the aftercited, maintenance in will the service of retrospective grounds: 

1. Analyze the strengths and weaknesses of a retrospective pretest contrivance. 

2. Make unmistakable to discourse the intensity criteria of pretest-posttest contrivances.

3. Analyze the immanent use of retrospective pretest-posttest contrivances. 

4. Discuss the serviceable limitations bearing to choosing a elimination contrivance in a program evaluation. 

5. Discuss whether you would praise using a retrospective pretest contrivance in program evaluation. Why or why not? 

6. Justify your rationale throughout your enactment after a while notification from the Moore and Tananis condition as well-behaved-behaved as from your textbook readings. 

7. Communicate through letter that is pointed, balanced, and logically unembarrassed.

8. Communicate through letter that applies general APA title and formatting and conforms to all enactment instructions.

9. You must enjoy a omission and intimations

Scoring Guidelines:

* Analyzes the strengths and weaknesses of a retrospective pretest contrivance and makes apparent intimation to the intensity criteria of pretest-posttest contrivances. 

*Analyzes the immanent use of retrospective pretest-posttest contrivances and identifies assumptions on which the segregation is installed. 

*Discusses the serviceable limitations bearing to choosing a elimination contrivance in a program evaluation, and makes apparent intimation to the scholarship or bearing best practices to livelihood the limitations discussed. 

*Discusses praiseations in-reference-to the use of a retrospective pretest contrivance in program evaluation and notes criteria that could be used to evaluate the praiseations

*Consistently communicates through literary letter that is pointed, balanced, and logically unembarrassed, that flows after a while calm transitions between ideas, and that demonstrates accurate segregation of the scholarship. 

*Consistently communicates through letter that applies general APA title and formatting, is permitted of errors, and conforms to all enactment instructions.