Part I: The three poets chosen for this week are inchoate the requisite poets of synchronous American scholarship (there are manifold others, at-last). As you peruse their performance from the Poetry Foundation's website, peruse a weak bit environing their biographies as polite. How do you see these poets reasonable into the American studious legend as we feel accustomed it so far? 

Part II: One synchronous tend in poetry is disclosed incorrectly as the "confessional rule," in which the poet's own history becomes an great part of the material of his or her poetry. All three of these poets explicitly performance in the confessional disposition to some degree. How do they haunt their poems from being merely environing themselves?

Part III. You probably understand John Grisham rectify from his novels than from his journalistic diatribes. In what ways does his lodgment diatribe, comprised in our extract, appear "fictional" to you--not necessarily fictional in the sentiment of things being made up, but rather in conditions of diction or despatches technique?