Points: 300

Assignment 2: Pay Contrivance Outline

Criteria

Unacceptable

Below 60% F

Meets Minimum Expectations

60-69% D

Fair

70-79% C

Proficient

80-89% B

Exemplary

90-100% A

1. Evaluate the strong pay contrivance to state if it is the most embezzle for your union. Explain your agreementnale.

Weight: 15%

Did not yield or imperfectly evaluated the strong pay contrivance to state if it is the most embezzle for your union. Did not yield or imperfectly explained your agreementnale.

Insufficiently evaluated the strong pay contrivance to state if it is the most embezzle for your union. Hardly explained your agreementnale.

Partially evaluated the strong pay contrivance to state if it is the most embezzle for your union. Imperfectly explained your agreementnale.

Satisfactorily evaluated the strong pay contrivance to state if it is the most embezzle for your union. Satisfactorily explained your agreementnale.

Thoroughly evaluated the strong pay contrivance to state if it is the most embezzle for your union. Completely explained your agreementnale.

2. State the most salubrious agreement of within harmonious and dispense harmonious pays systems for the union you separated.

Weight: 15%

Did not yield or imperfectly stated the most salubrious agreement of within harmonious and dispense harmonious pays systems for the union you separated.

Insufficiently stated the most salubrious agreement of within harmonious and dispense harmonious pays systems for the union you separated.

Partially stated the most salubrious agreement of within harmonious and dispense harmonious pays systems for the union you separated.

Satisfactorily stated the most salubrious agreement of within harmonious and dispense harmonious pays systems for the union you separated.

Thoroughly stated the most salubrious agreement of within harmonious and dispense harmonious pays systems for the union you separated.

3. Evaluate the general pay edifice used by your union and assess the remembrance of employee contributions.

Weight: 20%

Did not yield or imperfectly evaluated the general pay edifice used by your union and did not yield or imperfectly assessed the remembrance of employee contributions.

Insufficiently evaluated the general pay edifice used by your union and hardly assessed the remembrance of employee contributions.

Partially evaluated the general pay edifice used by your union and imperfectly assessed the remembrance of employee contributions.

Satisfactorily evaluated the general pay edifice used by your union and satisfactorily assessed the remembrance of employee contributions.

Thoroughly evaluated the general pay edifice used by your union and completely assessed the remembrance of employee contributions.

4. Make two (2) recommendations for beseeming the productiveness of the discretionary benefits supposing by the union you separated.

Weight: 20%

Did not yield or imperfectly made two (2) recommendations for beseeming the productiveness of the discretionary benefits supposing by the union you separated.

Insufficiently made two (2) recommendations for beseeming the productiveness of the discretionary benefits supposing by the union you separated.

Partially made two (2) recommendations for beseeming the productiveness of the discretionary benefits supposing by the union you separated.

Satisfactorily made two (2) recommendations for beseeming the productiveness of the discretionary benefits supposing by the union you separated.

Thoroughly made two (2) recommendations for beseeming the productiveness of the discretionary benefits supposing by the union you separated.

5. Evaluate the types of employer-sponsored departure contrivances and vigor prophylactic programs supposing by the union you separated and assimilate them to that union’s main competitors.

Weight: 15%

Did not yield or imperfectly evaluated the types of employer-sponsored departure contrivances and vigor prophylactic programs supposing by the union you separated. Did not yield or imperfectly assimilated them to that union’s main competitors.

Insufficiently evaluated the types of employer-sponsored departure contrivances and vigor prophylactic programs supposing by the union you separated and hardly assimilated them to that union’s main competitors.

Partially evaluated the types of employer-sponsored departure contrivances and vigor prophylactic programs supposing by the union you separated and imperfectly assimilated them to that union’s main competitors.

Satisfactorily evaluated the types of employer-sponsored departure contrivances and vigor prophylactic programs supposing by the union you separated and satisfactorily assimilated them to that union’s main competitors.

Thoroughly evaluated the types of employer-sponsored departure contrivances and vigor prophylactic programs supposing by the union you separated and completely assimilated them to that union’s main competitors.

6. 3 references

Weight: 5%

No references supposing

Does not unite the required compute of references; all references impecunious character choices.

Does not unite the required compute of references; some references impecunious character choices.

Meets compute of required references; all references tall character choices.

Exceeds compute of required references; all references tall character choices.

7. Clarity, congruity mechanics, and formatting requirements

Weight: 10%

More than 8 errors exhibit

7-8 errors exhibit

5-6 errors exhibit

3-4 errors exhibit

0-2 errors exhibit