Assignment: Application of Cognitive Behavior Theory to a Case Study

Required Readings

Turner, F. J. (Ed.). (2017). Social effect tenor: Interlocking presumptive adites (6th ed.). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
Chapter 4: Apprehensive Deportment Plea and Collective Effect Tenor (pp. 54–79)
Chapter 5: Apprehensive Plea and Collective Effect Tenor (pp. 80–95)

González-Prendes, A. A., & Thomas, S. A. (2009). Culturally impressible tenor of ruffle in African American women: A unique instance con-over. Clinical Instance Studies, 8(5), 383–402. 

Graham, M. A., Sauerheber, J. D., & Britzman, M. J. (2013). Excellent plea and source counseling: A pragmatic, culturally impressible adit. Family Journal, 21(2), 230–234. 

Document: Worksheet: Dissecting a Plea and Its Contact to a Instance Con-over (Word muniment)

Document: Theory Into Practice: Four Collective Effect Instance Studies (PDF)

Required Media

Sommers-Flanagan, J., & Sommers-Flanagan, R. (2014). Counseling and psychotherapy theories in matter and experience [Video rasp].

This week, guard the “Behavioral Therapy” and “Cognitive-Behavioral Therapy” segments by guarding from 2:04:04 - 2:52:18 on the term marker.

Optional Resources

Gregory, V. L. (2010). Cognitive-behavioral therapy for bipolar disorder: implications for clinical collective effecters. Journal of Collective Service Research, 36(5), 460–469.

Gregory, V. L. (2010). Cognitive-behavioral therapy for schizophrenia: contacts to collective effect experience. Collective Effect in Mental Health, 8(2), 140–159.

Pössel, P., & Knopf, K. (2011). Bridging the gaps: An seek to combine three important apprehensive dejection models. Apprehensive Therapy & Research, 35(4), 342–358.
(Only learn pp. 342–344)

Hinton, D. E., & Pollack, M. H. (2009). Introduction to the eespecial consequence: Anxiety disorders in cross-cultural perspective. CNS Neuroscience & Therapeutics, 15(3), 207–209. doi:10.1111/j.1755-5949.2009.00097.x

Robey, P., Burdenski, T. K., Britzman, M., Crowell, J., & Cisse, G. S. (2011). Systemic contacts of excellent plea and substantiality therapy: An consultation after a while Glasser Scholars. The Source Journal, 19(4), 427–433. 

Assignment: Contact of Apprehensive Deportment Plea to a Instance Study

This week, your presumptive orientation is apprehensive deportment plea. You procure use the corresponding instance con-over that you chose in Week 2 and reach been analyzing in this race. Use the "Dissecting a Plea and Its Contact to a Instance Study” effectsheet to acceleration you take-to-pieces the plea. You do not need to acquiesce this handout. It is a utensil for you to use to take-to-pieces the plea and then you can accustom the counsel in the table to exhaustive your provision.

In this Assignment, you afford a 5-minute video instance endowment. It is niggardly to offer a instance separation in multidisciplinary team consultations or after a while your director and colleagues. This provision offers you an occasion to afford insights and perspectives to a instance.

To afford:

  • Use the corresponding instance con-over that you chose in Week 2.
  • Read this expression listed in the Learning Resources: González-Prendes, A. A., & Thomas, S. A. (2009). Culturally impressible tenor of ruffle in African American women: A unique instance con-over. Clinical Instance Studies, 8(5), 383–402.

    This expression affords a particular frameeffect for how the authors’ apprehensive-behavioral presumptive orientation shaped the conceptualization of the instance and duty and insinuation.

To upload your instrument for this Assignment, use the Kaltura Instrument discretion from the mashup utensil drop-down menu. Refer to the Kaltura Instrument Uploader area in the race navigation menu for past counsel environing how to upload instrument to the race.

By Day 7

Submit a Kaltura video of yourself discussing the client. Your video should be no longer than 5 minutes.

  • Although this is a authoritative endowment, it is not a precise endowment as in a discourse. Imagine that you are discussing your instance after a while a clump of peers in a consultation. For model, if you misjudge a bit, don’t reach you reach to annals yourself frequently.
  • You can reach notes in face of you to acceleration you bear-in-mind your points.
  • However, your video does need to be professional. In other language, clothing authoritatively and induce yourself as if you are in an performance contrast after a while colleagues and directors. Be indisputable to binder eye contiguity as if you were suggestive in face of your colleagues. Finally, be indisputable to annals yourself in a margin that is allay and where no one interrupts you.

Your video endowment should grasp the following:

  • In 1 to 2 sentences, test and recount the offering tenor.
  • In 1 to 2 sentences, little eliminate and conceptualize the tenor from a apprehensive-behavioral presumptive orientation.
  • Formulate 2 duty questions that you procure ask the client to improve perceive the client’s tenor. Remember, the duty questions should be guided by apprehensive-behavioral plea.
  • In 1 to 2 sentences, test two appearances for tenor. Again, bear-in-mind, the appearances should be compatible after a while apprehensive-behavioral plea.
  • In 1 to 2 sentences, recount the tenor drawing from a apprehensive-behavioral presumptive orientation. Remember, the tenor drawing should align after a while the appearance(s) for effect.
  • Discuss one upshot you would estimate, if you were to evaluate whether the insinuation effected, and clear-up how this is compatible after a while apprehensive deportment plea. Evaluate one worth and one taciturnity of apprehensive deportment plea as it relates to the instance con-over.
  • Evaluate the contact of apprehensive-behavioral plea in affinity to a difference consequence congruous to the instance.

Be indisputable to:

  • Identify and uprightly relation the instance con-over you reach clarified.
  • Speak clearly
Order a unique copy of this paper
(550 words)

Approximate price: $22

Basic features
  • Free title page and bibliography
  • Unlimited revisions
  • Plagiarism-free guarantee
  • Money-back guarantee
  • 24/7 support
On-demand options
  • Writer’s samples
  • Part-by-part delivery
  • Overnight delivery
  • Copies of used sources
  • Expert Proofreading
Paper format
  • 275 words per page
  • 12 pt Arial/Times New Roman
  • Double line spacing
  • Any citation style (APA, MLA, Chicago/Turabian, Harvard)

Our guarantees

Delivering a high-quality product at a reasonable price is not enough anymore.
That’s why we have developed 5 beneficial guarantees that will make your experience with our service enjoyable, easy, and safe.

Money-back guarantee

You have to be 100% sure of the quality of your product to give a money-back guarantee. This describes us perfectly. Make sure that this guarantee is totally transparent.

Read more

Zero-plagiarism guarantee

Each paper is composed from scratch, according to your instructions. It is then checked by our plagiarism-detection software. There is no gap where plagiarism could squeeze in.

Read more

Free-revision policy

Thanks to our free revisions, there is no way for you to be unsatisfied. We will work on your paper until you are completely happy with the result.

Read more

Privacy policy

Your email is safe, as we store it according to international data protection rules. Your bank details are secure, as we use only reliable payment systems.

Read more

Fair-cooperation guarantee

By sending us your money, you buy the service we provide. Check out our terms and conditions if you prefer business talks to be laid out in official language.

Read more

Calculate the price of your order

550 words
We'll send you the first draft for approval by September 11, 2018 at 10:52 AM
Total price:
The price is based on these factors:
Academic level
Number of pages