Benchmark- research critique and picot statement final draft

Benchmark - Learning Critiques and PICOT Announcement Final Draft

 

1
Unsatisfactory
0.00%

2
Less than Satisfactory
75.00%

3
Satisfactory
83.00%

4
Good
94.00%

5
Excellent
100.00%

60.0 %Content

 

5.0 % Nursing Exercitation Whole and PICOT Statement

A nursing exercitation whole is not plainly picturesque and/or a PICOT announcement is not comprised.

PICOT announcement describes a nursing exercitation whole but after a whiledrawals trustworthy sources.

PICOT announcement describes a nursing exercitation whole and includes a few trustworthy sources.

PICOT announcement articulates a nursing exercitation whole using stayed notification from trustworthy sources.

PICOT announcement plainly articulates a nursing exercitation whole using corporeal stayed notification from muddy trustworthy sources.

5.0 % Background of Consider

Background of consider including whole, soundness to nursing, view, external, and learning questions is spoilt.

Background of consider including whole, soundness to nursing, view, external, and learning questions is comprised but after a whiledrawals bearing details and interpretation.

Background of consider including whole, soundness to nursing, view, external, and learning questions is imperfectly finished and includes some bearing details and interpretation.

Background of consider including whole, soundness to nursing, view, external, and learning questions is finished and includes bearing details and interpretation.

Background of consider including whole, soundness to nursing, view, external, and learning questions is entire after a while corporeal bearing details and liberal interpretation.

5.0 % Method of Study

Discussion of way of consider including reasoning of conceptual/theoretical framework is spoilt.

Discussion of way of consider including reasoning of conceptual/theoretical framework is comprised but after a whiledrawals bearing details and interpretation.

Discussion of way of consider including reasoning of conceptual/theoretical framework is imperfectly finished and includes some bearing details and interpretation.

Discussion of way of consider including reasoning of conceptual/theoretical framework is finished and includes bearing details and interpretation.

Discussion of way of consider including reasoning of conceptual/theoretical framework is entire after a while corporeal bearing details and liberal interpretation.

5.0 % Results of Study

Discussion of consider results including findings and implications for nursing exercitation is spoilt.

Discussion of consider results including findings and implications for nursing exercitation is comprised but after a whiledrawals bearing details and interpretation.

Discussion of consider results including findings and implications for nursing exercitation is imperfectly finished and includes some bearing details and interpretation.

Discussion of consider results including findings and implications for nursing exercitation is finished and includes bearing details and interpretation.

Discussion of consider results including findings and implications for nursing exercitation is entire after a while corporeal bearing details and liberal interpretation.

5.0 % Ethical Considerations

Discussion of immaterial considerations associated after a while the guide of nursing learning is spoilt.

Discussion of immaterial considerations associated after a while the guide of nursing learning is comprised but after a whiledrawals bearing details and interpretation.

Discussion of immaterial considerations associated after a while the guide of nursing learning is imperfectly finished and includes some bearing details and interpretation.

Discussion of immaterial considerations associated after a while the guide of nursing learning is finished and includes bearing details and interpretation.

Discussion of immaterial considerations associated after a while the guide of nursing learning is entire after a while corporeal bearing details and liberal interpretation.

5.0 % Conclusion

Conclusion does not digest a ticklish appraisal and applicability of findings.

Conclusion is unsettled and does not sift-canvass consequence to nursing.

Conclusion digests usefulness of the learning and consequence to nursing exercitation.

Conclusion digests usefulness of the learning from the ticklish appraisal and the findings consequence to nursing exercitation.

Conclusion digests usefulness of the learning from the ticklish appraisal, information skilled, and the consequence of the findings to nursing exercitation.

10.0 % Evidence of Qualification

Final tract does not demonstrate amalgamation of feedback or proof of qualification on learning zests.

Incorporation of learning zest feedback or proof of qualification is spoilt.

Incorporation of learning zest feedback and proof of qualification are introduce.

Evidence of amalgamation of learning zest feedback and qualification is plainly supposing.

Evidence of amalgamation of learning zest feedback and qualification is compendious and entirely plain.

10.0 % PICOT Statement, Learning Article, and Nursing Exercitation Whole Be-mixed (C. 2.2)

Discussion of the be-mixed betwixt the PICOT announcement, learning doctrines, and nursing exercitation whole is not comprised.

Discussion of the be-mixed betwixt the PICOT announcement, learning doctrines, and nursing exercitation whole is spoilt or loose.

Discussion of the be-mixed betwixt the PICOT announcement, learning doctrines, and nursing exercitation whole is comprised but after a whiledrawals bearing details and stayed interpretation.

Discussion of the be-mixed betwixt the PICOT announcement, learning doctrines, and nursing exercitation whole is finished and includes bearing details and stayed interpretation.

Discussion of the be-mixed betwixt the PICOT announcement, learning doctrines, and nursing exercitation whole is very-much entire after a while corporeal bearing details and liberal stayed interpretation.

10.0 % Proposed Evidence-Based Exercitation Alter (C. 3.2)

The contemplated proof-based exercitation alter is not comprised.

The contemplated proof-based exercitation alter is spoilt or loose.

Discussion of the be-mixed betwixt the PICOT announcement, learning doctrines, and nursing exercitation whole is comprised but after a whiledrawals bearing details and stayed interpretation. The contemplated proof-based exercitation alter is comprised but after a whiledrawals stayed interpretation and bearing details.

The contemplated proof-based exercitation alter is finished and includes stayed interpretation and bearing details.

The contemplated proof-based exercitation alter is very-much entire and includes corporeal stayed interpretation and muddy bearing details.

30.0 %Organization and Effectiveness

 

10.0 % Thesis Product and Purpose

Paper after a whiledrawals any palpable overall view or organizing pretension.

Thesis is barely plain or unsettled. View is not intelligible.

Thesis is ostensible and embezzle to view.

Thesis is intelligible and forecasts the product of the tract. Thesis is picturesque and inobservant of the reasonings and embezzle to the view.

Thesis is compendious and contains the substance of the tract. Thesis announcement makes the view of the tract intelligible.

10.0 % Argument Logic and Construction

Statement of view is not justified by the quittance. The quittance does not stay the pretension made. Reasoning is loose and uses nonprobable sources.

Sufficient advocacy of pretensions is rare. Reasoning after a whiledrawals congruous oneness. There are explicit flaws in the logic. Some sources enjoy problematical accuracy.

Argument is quiet, but may enjoy a few inconsistencies. The reasoning introduces minimal advocacy of pretensions. Reasoning argumentatively, but not entirely, stays the view. Sources used are probable. Prelude and quittance concatenate the thesis.

Argument shows argumentative gradations. Techniques of reasoningation are incontrovertible. There is a allay gradation of pretensions from prelude to quittance. Most sources are arrogant.

Argument is intelligible and convincing and introduces a precatory pretension in a main and compelling behavior. All sources are arrogant.

10.0 % Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, phraseology, phraseology use)

Surface falsitys are pervasive ample that they defer message of signification. Inembezzle term cherished or phrase rendering is used.

Frequent and repetitive unreflective falsitys madden the reader. Inconsistencies in phraseology cherished (register), phrase construction, or term cherished are introduce.

Some unreflective falsitys or typos are introduce, but they are not overly maddening to the reader. Set-right phrase construction and audience-embezzle phraseology are used.

Prose is abundantly at-liberty of unreflective falsitys, although a few may be introduce. A miscellany of phrase constructions and efficacious figures of harangue are used.

Writer is plainly in direct of type, written, academic English.

10.0 %Format

 

5.0 % Paper Format (use of embezzle name for the main and ordinance)

Template is not used embezzlely or documentation format is casually followed uprightly.

Template is used, but some elements are mislaying or mistaken; after a whiledrawal of guide after a while formatting is ostensible.

Template is used, and formatting is set-right, although some younger falsitys may be introduce.

Template is largely used; There are virtually no falsitys in formatting name.

All format elements are set-right.

5.0 % Documentation of Sources (citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., as embezzle to ordinance and name)

Sources are not documented.

Documentation of sources is incongruous or loose, as embezzle to ordinance and name, after a while muddy formatting falsitys.

Sources are documented, as embezzle to ordinance and name, although some formatting falsitys may be introduce.

Sources are documented, as embezzle to ordinance and name, and format is in-great-measure set-right.

Sources are finishedly and uprightly documented, as embezzle to ordinance and name, and format is at-liberty of falsity.

100 % Total Weightage

     
Order a unique copy of this paper
(550 words)

Approximate price: $22

Basic features
  • Free title page and bibliography
  • Unlimited revisions
  • Plagiarism-free guarantee
  • Money-back guarantee
  • 24/7 support
On-demand options
  • Writer’s samples
  • Part-by-part delivery
  • Overnight delivery
  • Copies of used sources
  • Expert Proofreading
Paper format
  • 275 words per page
  • 12 pt Arial/Times New Roman
  • Double line spacing
  • Any citation style (APA, MLA, Chicago/Turabian, Harvard)

Our guarantees

Delivering a high-quality product at a reasonable price is not enough anymore.
That’s why we have developed 5 beneficial guarantees that will make your experience with our service enjoyable, easy, and safe.

Money-back guarantee

You have to be 100% sure of the quality of your product to give a money-back guarantee. This describes us perfectly. Make sure that this guarantee is totally transparent.

Read more

Zero-plagiarism guarantee

Each paper is composed from scratch, according to your instructions. It is then checked by our plagiarism-detection software. There is no gap where plagiarism could squeeze in.

Read more

Free-revision policy

Thanks to our free revisions, there is no way for you to be unsatisfied. We will work on your paper until you are completely happy with the result.

Read more

Privacy policy

Your email is safe, as we store it according to international data protection rules. Your bank details are secure, as we use only reliable payment systems.

Read more

Fair-cooperation guarantee

By sending us your money, you buy the service we provide. Check out our terms and conditions if you prefer business talks to be laid out in official language.

Read more

Calculate the price of your order

550 words
We'll send you the first draft for approval by September 11, 2018 at 10:52 AM
Total price:
$26
The price is based on these factors:
Academic level
Number of pages
Urgency