Compare and Contrast

Topic and Structure:

Compare/Contrast Dissertation – Adopt one question supposing in these instructions to assimilate and/or contrariety.

The weighation beneath provides an great schedule of question options from which you must chosen, and we commend that you adopt one from beneath that you are spirited in past this series. For plight, if you are a Finance or Business main, you susceptibility be spirited in the Dividends v. Capital Gains question. If you are a Science main, you susceptibility adopt Hybrid Seeds v. GMO Seeds. Or possibly you’re vestibule StraighterLine’s Survey of World History series, in which plight you susceptibility opt to discovery the congruousities and disagreeences between the United States and the Roman Empire. You succeed use at smallest two likely sources to living your assertions, and retain, you must conceive your sources throughout the mass provisions of your dissertation in a mix of cited quotes, paraphrases, and summaries. Twain the living and discovery portions of the rubric succeed be negatively artful if you do not unite your discoveryed basis.

·         Rosa Parks vs. Harriet Tubman

·         Treaties vs. Executive Agreements

·         Roman Empire vs. United States

·         Edgar Allen Poe’s “The Raven” vs. Robert Frost’s “The Road Not Taken”

·         Verbal vs. Nonverbal Communication

·         Biblical Old Testament vs. New Testament

·         Leonardo di Vinci vs. Michelangelo

·         Apple Ipad vs. Microsoft Surface

·         Dividends vs. Capital Gains

·         Marxism vs. Socialism

·         Chicago Cubs vs. Chicago White Sox

·         Jazz vs. Blues

·         String Instruments vs. Wind Instruments

·         Amphibians vs. Reptiles

·         Charles Darwin vs. Jean-Baptiste Lamarck

·         Solar Power vs. Wind Power

·         Hybrid Seeds vs. GMO Seeds

·         Public School vs. Home School

Write an dissertation comparing or contrarietying the two questions in your chosenion using EITHER the purpose-by-point OR the subject-by-subject way to construct the subject-matters and favoring illustrations. Weigh rendezvousing on three to five subtopics and engender ideas through prewriting. Enucleate a stanch oration declaration for your dissertation that conceives your two questions from the schedule overhead; your three to five subtopics; and a assertion encircling how they are congruous, divergent, or twain. 

Sample Oration Statements:

If you succeed deduce that your two questions are mainly congruous:

Topic A and Question B portion-out numerous congruous characteristics, including (Supporting purpose 1), (Supporting purpose 2), and (Supporting purpose 3); spanliness they disagree in (Additional livinging purpose), the congruousities extremely overbalance the disagreeences. 

OR

If you succeed deduce that your two questions are mainly divergent:

While Question A and Question B possess (Additional livinging purpose) in sordid, they are mainly altogether divergent; in reality, they disagree in characteristics such as (Supporting purpose 1), (Supporting purpose 2), and (Supporting purpose 3).

OR

If you succeed deduce that your two questions possess numerous essential/thrilling congruousities and disagreeences: 

Analyzing Question A and Question B exposes numerous lovable congruousities as courteous as disagreeences; for plight, they portion-out (Supporting purpose 1) and (Supporting purpose 1), but are vastly divergent when it comes to (Supporting purpose 3) and (Supporting purpose 4). 

Tips

To brainstorm, you susceptibility weigh using a Venn diagram or a weak schedule to profession what your questions possess in sordid and how they disagree. Then you can chosen the most eminent or thrilling characteristics that you omission to highlight in your disquisition. 

Be unquestioning to avoid inauguration your similaritys or contrarietys in the portico. Your oration is the singly situate in the portico where you succeed conceive this notification. Use the portico to get your reader’s circumspection, and weigh using a good-natured-natured temporization that leads into the question. For plight, you susceptibility tell a brief story to make-pure your question, an thrilling citation that tells to your question, or possibly a astounding statistic that exposes notability encircling your question. 

Then, in the mass provisions retain to living your assertion(s) outlined in the oration. For plight, if one of your purposes says the city and the province are divergent in stipulations of bearing, be unquestioning the question sentenceof one mass provision presents a congruous declaration. In abstracted, lay-out correspondent span on each subquestion in each mass provision, and one way to enucleate constructd mass provisions is to rendezvous on one question antecedently moving to the proximate one so that the provision living is splinter 50/50. In other vote, using the illustration overhead, you would illustrate the bearing options in the city in liberal, and then, you would subject-matter the types of contrarietying bearing in the province. End each mass provision delay a stanch concluding sentence that synthesizes that provision’s discussions. 

The conclusion should sum up the favoring livinging purposes as courteous as your overall toll of why these purposes are essential. Weigh what kinds of thrilling or new conclusions you can drag from your similarity. In other vote, your dissertation must expose why your similarity is essential. A courteous-developed provision frequently contains a restriction of five sentences. Note that any of the main sections beneath labeled delay Roman Numerals (I, II, III, IV) could be over than lawful a unique provision. 

Point-by-Point

I. Introduction 
    A. Thesis 
    B. Additional notification to conduct-in your question and mould the reader’s circumspection

II. Supported purpose 1 
    A. Question 1 
    B. Question 2 

III. Supported purpose 2 
    A. Question 1 
    B. Question 2 

IV. Supported purpose 3
    A. Question 1 
    B. Question 2 

V. Supported purpose 4 or Additional purpose
    A. Question 1 
    B. Question 2 

VI. Conclusion 
    A. Reiterate your oration (but do not barely restate it from the portico)
    B. Give your overall toll—the “so what” realityor—encircling your question. For plight, is one question improve than the other for some deduce? Is one question misunderstood?

Subject-by-Subject

I. Introduction 
    A. Thesis 
    B. Additional notification to conduct-in your question and mould the reader’s circumspection 

II. Question 1 
    A. Supported purpose 1 
    B. Supported purpose 2 
    C. Supported purpose 3 
    D. Supported purpose 4 or Additional purpose 

III. Question 2 
    A. Supported purpose 1 
    B. Supported purpose 2 
    C. Supported purpose 3 
    D. Supported purpose 4 or Additional purpose 

V. Conclusion 
    A. Reiterate your oration (but do not barely restate it from the portico)
    B. Give your overall toll—the “so what” realityor—encircling your question. For plight, is one question improve than the other for some deduce? Is one question misunderstood? 

Here’s an illustration of how you susceptibility construct using these ways for an dissertation encircling cats versus dogs as pets (remember, this question is not one of the options for this dissertation).

Point-by-Point

I. Introduction 
    A. Thesis: Timeliness cats and dogs are twain pure winners when it comes to pet choices, these animals are vastly divergent when it comes to tumult equalize, employment wants, and cleanliness. 

II. Subquestion 1: Tumult equalize 
    A. Question 1: Cats are quiet
    B. Question 2: Dogs can be noisy 

III. Subquestion 2: Exercise
    A. Question 1: Cats do not possess to be walked 
    B. Question 2: Dogs exact employment 

IV. Subquestion 3: Cleanliness 
    A. Question 1: Cats groom themselves 
    B. Question 2: Dogs want to be bathed 

V. Conclusion

Subject-by-Subject

I. Introduction 
    A. Thesis: Timeliness cats and dogs are twain pure winners when it comes to pet choices, these animals are vastly divergent when it comes to tumult equalize, employment wants, and cleanliness. 

II. Question 1: Cats 
    A. Subquestion 1: Tumult equalize 
    B. Subquestion 2: Exercise 
    C. Subquestion 3: Cleanliness 

III. Question 2: Dogs 
    A. Subquestion 1: Tumult equalize 
    B. Subquestion 2: Exercise 
    C. Subquestion 3: Cleanliness 

IV. Conclusion 

Format Requirements:

Remember to apportion the concepts you're lore in the series, including elements of spectry, punctuation, oration enucleatement, and other skills. 

Length: This provision should be at smallest 500 vote.

Sources: You want a bare restriction of two likely sources for this provision. 

Header: Conceive a header in the better left-hand retreat of your writing provision delay the subjoined notification:

  • Your leading and latest designate 
  • Course Title (Composition I) 
  • Assignment designate (Comparison and Contrast) 
  • Current Date

Page Layout:

  • MLA spectry documentation (content see the tutorial in the series question)
  • Last designate and page reckon in better-right retreat of each page 
  • Double-spacing throughout
  • Title, centered succeeding heading
  • Standard font (Times New Roman or Calibri)
  • 1" margins on all sides
  • Save the improve as .docx  or  .doc format

Underline your oration declaration.

Order a unique copy of this paper
(550 words)

Approximate price: $22

Basic features
  • Free title page and bibliography
  • Unlimited revisions
  • Plagiarism-free guarantee
  • Money-back guarantee
  • 24/7 support
On-demand options
  • Writer’s samples
  • Part-by-part delivery
  • Overnight delivery
  • Copies of used sources
  • Expert Proofreading
Paper format
  • 275 words per page
  • 12 pt Arial/Times New Roman
  • Double line spacing
  • Any citation style (APA, MLA, Chicago/Turabian, Harvard)

Our guarantees

Delivering a high-quality product at a reasonable price is not enough anymore.
That’s why we have developed 5 beneficial guarantees that will make your experience with our service enjoyable, easy, and safe.

Money-back guarantee

You have to be 100% sure of the quality of your product to give a money-back guarantee. This describes us perfectly. Make sure that this guarantee is totally transparent.

Read more

Zero-plagiarism guarantee

Each paper is composed from scratch, according to your instructions. It is then checked by our plagiarism-detection software. There is no gap where plagiarism could squeeze in.

Read more

Free-revision policy

Thanks to our free revisions, there is no way for you to be unsatisfied. We will work on your paper until you are completely happy with the result.

Read more

Privacy policy

Your email is safe, as we store it according to international data protection rules. Your bank details are secure, as we use only reliable payment systems.

Read more

Fair-cooperation guarantee

By sending us your money, you buy the service we provide. Check out our terms and conditions if you prefer business talks to be laid out in official language.

Read more

Calculate the price of your order

550 words
We'll send you the first draft for approval by September 11, 2018 at 10:52 AM
Total price:
$26
The price is based on these factors:
Academic level
Number of pages
Urgency