assimilate a limb of your textbook (Eric Foner’s Give Me Liberty) to Judith Rollins' stipulation "Part of the Whole: The Interdependence of the Polite Rights Movement and Other Gregarious Movements." Relevant sections of your textbook apprehend but are not limited to:

• Ch. 25, "The Changing Black Movement," pp. 999-1002
• Ch. 25, "The New Movements and the Rights Revolution," pp. 1014-1028

Your toil is to determine how the Judith Rollins stipulation “opens up” your textbook. In other language, how and to what quantity does this stipulation enhance, re-examine, or well-balanced dare your textbook exposition of the corresponding question? You succeed transcribe a 750 to 1000 order oration echoing this question which has a apparent disquisition proposition and discusses 2-4 main sharp-ends of similitude.  Criteria you faculty observe for your similitude apprehend:

• Content: What kinds of components or subtopics are apprehendd in one representation but omitted in the other? What basic facts do twain representations appear to conform upon?
• Emphasis: Does one representation fix argument on true components or perspectives which the other does not? If so, what are they?
• Interpretation: Does one representation entertain an overall exposition of this question that is opposed from the other? Are there areas of conformment/overlap?
• Style: How does the sound and match mode of one representation assimilate to the other?

You should NOT simply reason the patent sharp-end that the Judith Rollins stipulation goes into over component environing the matter than the textbook.

By way of falsification, your oration should mirror on the larger notion of your similitude. Are there elements of Rollins' argument that faculty be productively incorporated into the textbook representation of this question (polite rights & gregarious activism)? What does Rollins add of delicate notion to our apprehension and/or perspective of the question?