Computer Science

Submit Assignment

  • Due Sunday by 11:59pm
  • Points 100
  • Submitting a refine upload

Introduction

Now that you feel made a proposition, we insufficiency to garner evidence! This week you get be learninging and garnering axioms that shows why you regard it is influential to follow your proposition. Shape sconsideration to garner as greatly as notification as feasible so you can form meaningful charts proximate week. This week's performance get be the plea for proximate week's enactment.

Learn

Textbook Reading

Below you get assure the citationbook lection for the week. Remember to thorough your lection by Wednesday to be unconditional for the week!

Microsoft Office 2016 at performance for dummies (Links to an apparent seat.)

  • Understanding Excel interface - Chapter 7
  • Entering and editing axioms - Chapter 7
  • Autofill - Chapter 7
  • Cell superintendence - Chapter 7
  • Sheet superintendence - Chapter 7
  • Cell References - Chapter 8
  • Basic Formulas - Chapter 8
  • Insert Functions - Chapter 8
  • Tables - Chapter 10

Office 2016 All-In-One for Dummies (Links to an apparent seat.)

Apply

Required Resources

The subjoined media get be used to thorough your enactment:

  • Microsoft Excel

This week you get thorough the primary exhaust of your Excel distributesheet. Follow the steps listed under to thorough the primary bisect of your axioms garnerion.

  1. Create a new Excel refine and persuade it "YourName_COMP150_W5_Assignment".
  2. Add two new equivocations and designate them as "Read Me" and "Main Data".
  3. The "Read Me" equivocation is the situate where you get add your designate and determination. You get so decipher the point of the muniment and the sign of notification you are providing. See the model under.
    screenshot of model "read me" equivocation
  4. Based on your learning subject, you insufficiency to cater a great set of axioms that can be used for separation during this week and proximate. Your axioms set must be at lowest 10 rows and 3 columns and no over than 50 rows or 10 columns. You can shape this up or do learning to assure a axioms set. The axioms set must feel gum to succor delay the calculations in the proximate steps, so it is recommended to retrospect the integral enactment anteriorly you form the axioms set. 
  5. The consideration delay the axiomsset must feel a header that is merged and interior.
  6. The axioms must be plain so shape sconsideration the columns and rows feel abundance spacing
  7. You are expected to feel all of the subjoined calculations
    1. A formula using a referring-to intimation
    2. A formula using an arbitrary intimation
    3. Use at lowest three contrariant functions
  8. Ensconsideration the contrariant signs of axioms feel the improve formatting. Here are some guidelines
    1. Dates should feel "date" formatting
    2. Any publicity should feel two decimals
    3. Any citation should be set up as "text" or "general"
  9. Feel unconditional to be notional by adding images or another formatting, and thorough the refine. Shape sconsideration the refine is designated "YourName_COMP150_W5_Assignment" and resign the refine.

Grading

This motive get be graded fixed on the Week 5 Enactment rubric.

Course Outcomes (CO): 4

Due Date: By 11:59 p.m. MT on Sunday

Rubric

Week 5 Enactment RubricWeek 5 Enactment RubricCriteriaRatingsPtsThis proof is linked to a Learning Outcome“Read Me” and “Main Data” equivocations were formd10.0 ptsProficient Sheets were adventitious and redesignated truly5.0 ptsAverage Sheets were adventitious but not renamed0.0 its subject is not apt to the enactment10.0 pts
This proof is linked to a Learning OutcomeRead Me equivocation is employed delay designate, determination, and explanation10.0 ptsProficient Read Me Equivocation was all notification required and formatted as beseeched5.0 ptsAverage Read Me equivocation has sure notification and raze or organization0.0 ptsNo Effort10.0 pts
This proof is linked to a Learning OutcomeData caterd meets the 10 rows X 3 columns beseech and no over than 50 rows X 10 columns10.0 ptsProficient Axioms caterd meets the partiality requirements5.0 ptsAverage Axioms was caterd but it is not disroute the partiality requirements0.0 ptsNo Effort10.0 pts
This proof is linked to a Learning OutcomeTable has a merged header and interiored10.0 ptsProficient Consideration has a header that is merged and interiored5.0 ptsAverage Consideration has a header but it is not merged and interiored0.0 ptsNo Effort10.0 pts
This proof is linked to a Learning OutcomeAll axioms should be plain delayout any errors10.0 ptsProficient Axioms does not ostentation any errors or symbols such as #######5.0 ptsAverage Some axioms is showing errors and symbols such as #####0.0 ptsNo Effort10.0 pts
This proof is linked to a Learning OutcomeThere is at lowest 1 referring-to intimation formula5.0 ptsProficient At lowest one referring-to intimation was formd0.0 ptsNo Effort5.0 pts
This proof is linked to a Learning OutcomeThere is at lowest 1 arbitrary intimation formula5.0 ptsProficient At lowest one arbitrary intimation was formd0.0 ptsNo Effort5.0 pts
This proof is linked to a Learning OutcomeImplements at lowest three contrariant functions20.0 ptsProficient There are at lowest three contrariant functions truly implemented10.0 ptsAverage There are at lowest 2 functions performanceing truly0.0 ptsNo Effort20.0 pts
This proof is linked to a Learning OutcomeFormatting is truly applied to determinations, citation, and publicity10.0 ptsProficient Formatting is truly applied to all signs of axioms.5.0 ptsAverage Formatting is not truly applied to sure signs of axioms.0.0 ptsNo Effort10.0 pts
This proof is linked to a Learning OutcomeDocument is systematic delay a heading and headers as insufficiencyed5.0 ptsProficient Muniment has all required headings and headers, has improve phraseology and spelling, and it is polite systematic2.5 ptsAverage Muniment has some of the required headings and headers or has some inimprove phraseology and spelling, and it is not polite systematic0.0 ptsNo Effort5.0 pts
This proof is linked to a Learning OutcomeDocument is designated as “YourName_COMP150_W5_Assignment”5.0 ptsProficient The muniment was redesignated including the student's designate, route, and week0.0 ptsNo Effort5.0 pts
Total Points: 100.0PreviousNext
Number Formatting - Chapter 1 of Book III Excel 2016

'Beena Shaji'_COMP 150_W5_Assignment

Author-Beena Shaji

Date-10-03-2020

Purpose-To learning how powerful is the medication Verzenio in the composition of Confront Cancer.

Content- 

Verzenio is a direction cure used to write a sign of confront cancer. It is a cure you can accept if:

  • You feel a sign of confront cancer persuadeed HR+/HER2– (hormone receptor-positive/human epidermal augmentation element receptor 2–negative) and cancer has distribute to other bisects of the collectiveness (metastasized)
  • Verzenio is consecrated parallel delay an aromatase inhibitor as modescold endocrine-fixed therapy for the composition of postmenopausal women, parallel delay fulvestrant in women whose malady has progressed succeeding hormonal therapy, or by itself in adults whose malady has progressed succeeding hormone therapy and previous chemotherapy

It is not disclosed if Verzenio is unendangered and powerful in consequence.

Cancer Composition Data- 

Verzenio is an powerful medication in writeing confront cancer and succoring idiosyncratics delay metastatic confront cancer that’s HR-positive and HER2-negative to feed longer.

Clinical trials of Verzenio looked at the series-unconditional action scold. This is the whole of era that a idiosyncratic goes delayout their plight getting any worse. On middle, idiosyncratics who took twain Verzenio and fulvestrant went 16.4 months delayout series. In similarity, idiosyncratics who took a placebo (composition delay no locomotive offal) parallel delay fulvestrant had a series-unconditional action scold of 9.3 months.

composition of confront Cancer

Order a unique copy of this paper
(550 words)

Approximate price: $22

Basic features
  • Free title page and bibliography
  • Unlimited revisions
  • Plagiarism-free guarantee
  • Money-back guarantee
  • 24/7 support
On-demand options
  • Writer’s samples
  • Part-by-part delivery
  • Overnight delivery
  • Copies of used sources
  • Expert Proofreading
Paper format
  • 275 words per page
  • 12 pt Arial/Times New Roman
  • Double line spacing
  • Any citation style (APA, MLA, Chicago/Turabian, Harvard)

Our guarantees

Delivering a high-quality product at a reasonable price is not enough anymore.
That’s why we have developed 5 beneficial guarantees that will make your experience with our service enjoyable, easy, and safe.

Money-back guarantee

You have to be 100% sure of the quality of your product to give a money-back guarantee. This describes us perfectly. Make sure that this guarantee is totally transparent.

Read more

Zero-plagiarism guarantee

Each paper is composed from scratch, according to your instructions. It is then checked by our plagiarism-detection software. There is no gap where plagiarism could squeeze in.

Read more

Free-revision policy

Thanks to our free revisions, there is no way for you to be unsatisfied. We will work on your paper until you are completely happy with the result.

Read more

Privacy policy

Your email is safe, as we store it according to international data protection rules. Your bank details are secure, as we use only reliable payment systems.

Read more

Fair-cooperation guarantee

By sending us your money, you buy the service we provide. Check out our terms and conditions if you prefer business talks to be laid out in official language.

Read more

Calculate the price of your order

550 words
We'll send you the first draft for approval by September 11, 2018 at 10:52 AM
Total price:
$26
The price is based on these factors:
Academic level
Number of pages
Urgency