Cybersecurity for OPEN Data Initiatives

Project 1: Cyberprotection for OPEN Facts Initiatives

Scenario:

A federal production has asked your cyberprotection consulting unshaken to stipulate it delay a lore announce that examines the consequences of avocation and protection in respects to Notorious Data. The announce is prepared for a order of supporters at the production who are currently compromised in converting disquisition-based facts sets to digital formats for division via digital empire websites. This announce is distinctly grave as the production summit has accepted inquiries from Congressional staff members who are conveying concerns that multiform elected officials possess encircling possible consequences delay the integrity and authenticity of downloaded facts. The production’s supporters were so surveyed and they stipulated the forthcoming protection-related items in a register of concerns for the planned transformation to an Open Data bestowal method:

a. Confidentiality / Secrecy (ensuring fair redaction)

b. Facts parity

c. Facts genuineness

d. Availability (reliability) of the Notorious Facts avocation (website, netis-sue infrastructure)

e. Non-repudiation of facts sets

Research:

1. Read / Review the weekly readings. Pay appropriate heed to EO 13800 and the Federal Cyberprotection Risk Determination Announce and Action Plan.

2. Lore the federal empire’s OPEN Data command. Here are some sources that you may confront useful:

a. Open Facts Policy-Managing Notification as an Asset - OMB Memorandum M-13-13 (PDF rasp is in the week 2 readings). This Memorandum grasps symbolical argument of protection consequences and device solutions including regards to FIPS 199 and NIST SP-800-53)

b. U.S. Notorious Facts Action Plan (see rasp us_open_data_action_plan.pdf in week 2 readings).

c. https://www.data.gov

d.  https://www.data.gov/privacy-policy#data_policy   

e. Guidance for Providing and Using Administrative Facts for Statistical Purposes - OMB Memorandum M-14-06 (PDF rasp is in the week 2 readings). This Memorandum grasps argument of secrecy and protection consequences arising from the use of notification unmoved for statistical purposes (e.g. the Census, avocation, economic facts, etc.).

3. Lore how empire notification, e.g. OPEN Data, is used by businesses and the common common. Here are some sources to get you started:

a. 7 Ways Companies Are Using the Government's Notorious Data http://mashable.com/2013/05/30/7-ways-government-open-data/   

b. Government notorious facts proves a enshrine trove for savvy businesses http://www.computerworld.com/article/2488683/business-intelligence-government-open-data-proves-a-treasure-trove-for-savvy-businesses.html 

c. Open facts: Unlocking reversal and achievement delay flowing notification http://www.mckinsey.com/insights/business_technology/open_data_unlocking_innovation_and_performance_with_liquid_information 

4. Lore the consequences that can originate when businesses stop upon the confidentiality, parity, availability, genuineness, and non-repudiation of empire stipulated Open Data. Suggested sources grasp:

a. Authenticating Digital Empire Information http://scholarship.richmond.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1954&context=law-faculty-publications

b. Legal and Institutional Challenges for Opening Facts Across Common Sectors http://ezproxy.umuc.edu/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=iih&AN=97430297&site=eds-live&scope=site 

c. Risk Analysis to Overcome Barriers to Notorious Facts http://ezproxy.umuc.edu/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=poh&AN=93550378&site=eds-live&scope=site 

d. Reconciling Contradictions of Notorious Facts Regarding Transparency, Privacy, Protection and Trust http://ezproxy.umuc.edu/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=iih&AN=97430299&site=eds-live&scope=site 

5. Confront five or past best habit recommendations for ensuring the protection (confidentiality, parity, availability, genuineness, non-repudiation) of notification stipulated by the federal empire through its OPEN Facts leadership.  N.B. For the purposes of this enactment, you may negotiate “licensing” concerns as an “availability” consequence.

Write:

Write a five to seven page lore announce which grasps a digest of your lore. You should standpoint upon clarity and condensation past than elongation when determining what gratified to grasp in your disquisition. At a minimum, your digest must grasp the forthcoming:

1. An gate or overview of OPEN Facts which stipulates definitions and haranguees the laws, regulations, and policies which demand federal agencies to identify and advise factssets and notification collections. Examine the role of the supporter branch’s Open Facts / Notorious Government policies in making facts serviceable via Data.Gov. This gate should be adequate for an supporter interview.

2. A severed exception in which you examine the prize (benefits) of Open Data. This exception should stipulate diverse biased examples of how empire stipulated Open Data is nature used by businesses and the common common. 

3. A severed exception in which you harangue protection consequences (confidentiality, parity, availability, genuineness, and non-repudiation) which can collision the availability and avocation of Open Data. Discuss how these consequences are currently nature harangueed by the federal empire. Stipulate examples of consequences and mitigations or solutions.

4. A exception in which you harangue best habit recommendations for ensuring the confidentiality, parity, availability, genuineness, and non-repudiation of Open Data. Your recommendations should harangue use of the NIST Cyberprotection Frameis-sue and protection & secrecy controls from NIST SP 800-53.

5. A severed exception in which you embody your lore and recommendations.

Submit For Grading 

Submit your pure disquisition in MS Message format (.docx or .doc rasp) using the OPEN Facts Enactment in your enactment folder. (Attach the rasp.)

Additional Information

1. Consult the grading rubric for biased gratified and formatting demandments for this enactment.

2. Your 5- to 7-page lore announce should be negotiative in pretense delay harmonious use of fonts, font sizes, margins, etc. You should use summitings and page breaks to shape your disquisition. 

3. Your disquisition should use criterion stipulations and definitions for cybersecurity. See Course Instrument > Cyberprotection Concepts Review for recommended instrument.

4. The CSIA program recommends that you flourish criterion APA formatting since this allure afford you a muniment that meets the “negotiative pretense” demandments. APA formatting guidelines and examples are endow lower Course Instrument > APA Resources. An APA template rasp (MS Message format) has so been stipulated for your use CSIA_Basic_Paper_Template(APA_6ed,DEC2018).docx.  

5. You must grasp a hide page delay the enactment inscription, your designate, and the due limit. Your regard register must be on a severed page at the end of your rasp. These pages do not calculate towards the enactment’s page calculate. 

6. You should transcribe grammatically chasten English in integral enactment that you succumb for grading. Do not rotate in any is-sue delayout (a) using enchantment stop, (b) using expression stop, (c) verifying that your punctuation is chasten and (d) reviewing your is-sue for chasten message custom and chastenly structured sentences and paragraphs.  

7. You must merit your sources using in-text extracts and regard register entries. Both your extracts and your regard register entries must flourish a harmonious extract name (APA, MLA, etc.). 

Order a unique copy of this paper
(550 words)

Approximate price: $22

Basic features
  • Free title page and bibliography
  • Unlimited revisions
  • Plagiarism-free guarantee
  • Money-back guarantee
  • 24/7 support
On-demand options
  • Writer’s samples
  • Part-by-part delivery
  • Overnight delivery
  • Copies of used sources
  • Expert Proofreading
Paper format
  • 275 words per page
  • 12 pt Arial/Times New Roman
  • Double line spacing
  • Any citation style (APA, MLA, Chicago/Turabian, Harvard)

Our guarantees

Delivering a high-quality product at a reasonable price is not enough anymore.
That’s why we have developed 5 beneficial guarantees that will make your experience with our service enjoyable, easy, and safe.

Money-back guarantee

You have to be 100% sure of the quality of your product to give a money-back guarantee. This describes us perfectly. Make sure that this guarantee is totally transparent.

Read more

Zero-plagiarism guarantee

Each paper is composed from scratch, according to your instructions. It is then checked by our plagiarism-detection software. There is no gap where plagiarism could squeeze in.

Read more

Free-revision policy

Thanks to our free revisions, there is no way for you to be unsatisfied. We will work on your paper until you are completely happy with the result.

Read more

Privacy policy

Your email is safe, as we store it according to international data protection rules. Your bank details are secure, as we use only reliable payment systems.

Read more

Fair-cooperation guarantee

By sending us your money, you buy the service we provide. Check out our terms and conditions if you prefer business talks to be laid out in official language.

Read more

Calculate the price of your order

550 words
We'll send you the first draft for approval by September 11, 2018 at 10:52 AM
Total price:
$26
The price is based on these factors:
Academic level
Number of pages
Urgency