Health information patient handout | Nursing homework help

      

REQUIRED CONTENT

EVALUATION

EXCELLENT

EVALUATION

GOOD

EVALUATION

FAIR

EVALUATION

POOR

SCORE

Includes a screen page and prelude forthe flyer delay an name of the end clarified, a name of the parley, and the quest conditions used to test instrument.

 

 

 

 

 

(10 practicable points)

This minority demonstrates excellence.  To close a rating of “excellent” the scholar must argue all of the concepts and key points presented in the text/s and Learning Resources.  Paper agrees forcible specialty including multiple bearing examples, declaration from the readings and other mate reviewed sources published delayin the late 5 years, and ardent ideas.

 

 

(910 points)

This minority demonstrates a good understanding of the resigned. To close a rating of “good” the scholar must argue most of the concepts and key points presented in the text/s and Learning Resources. Paper embraces temperate specialty, declaration from the readings, and ardent ideas.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(8 points)

This minority demonstrates a fairunderstanding of the resigned.  To close a rating of “fair” the scholar must argue some of the concepts and key points as presented in the text/s and Learning Resources. Paper may be scant in specialty and specificity and/or may not embrace suited just examples or agree suited declaration from the readings.

 

 

 

 

 

 

(7 points)

This minority demonstrates poor understanding of the resigned. To close a rating of “poor”, the scholar embraces few of the concepts and key points of the text/s and Learning Resources. Paper is dropping specialty and specificity and/or does not embrace any just examples or agree suited declaration from the readings.

 

 

 

 

(0–6 points)

     

In the Flyer:

Defines key conditions in a way that is alienate for the target parley.

 

 

 

 

 

(10 practicable points)

This minority demonstrates excellence.  To close a rating of “excellent” the scholar must argue all of the concepts and key points presented in the text/s and Learning Resources.  Paper agrees forcible specialty including multiple bearing examples, declaration from the readings and other mate reviewed sources published delayin the late 5 years, and ardent ideas.

 

 

(910 points)

This minority demonstrates a good understanding of the resigned. To close a rating of “good” the scholar must argue most of the concepts and key points presented in the text/s and Learning Resources. Paper embraces temperate specialty, declaration from the readings, and ardent ideas.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(8 points)

 

This minority demonstrates a fairunderstanding of the resigned.  To close a rating of “fair” the scholar must argue some of the concepts and key points as presented in the text/s and Learning Resources. Paper may be scant in specialty and specificity and/or may not embrace suited just examples or agree suited declaration from the readings.

 

 

 

 

 

 

(7 points)

 

This minority demonstrates poor understanding of the resigned. To close a rating of “poor”, the scholar embraces few of the concepts and key points of the text/s and Learning Resources. Paper is dropping specialty and specificity and/or does not embrace any just examples or agree suited declaration from the readings.

 

 

 

 

(0–6 points)

 

Describes the soundness end using accents alienate for the parley.

 

 

 

 

 

 (20 practicable points)

This minority demonstrates excellence.  To close a rating of “excellent” the scholar must argue all of the concepts and key points presented in the text/s and Learning Resources.  The minority agrees forcible specialty including multiple bearing examples, declaration from the readings and other mate reviewed sources published delayin the late 5 years, and ardent ideas.

 

(1920 points)

This minority demonstrates a good understanding of the resigned. To close a rating of “good” the scholar must argue most of the concepts and key points presented in the text/s and Learning Resources. The minority embraces temperate specialty, declaration from the readings, and ardent ideas.

 

 

 

 

 

 

(17–18 points)

This minority demonstrates a fairunderstanding of the resigned.  To close a rating of “fair” the scholar must argue some of the concepts and key points as presented in the text/s and Learning Resources. The minority may be scant in specialty and specificity and/or may not embrace suited just examples or agree suited declaration from the readings.

 

 

 

 

 

(15–16 points)

This minority demonstrates poor understanding of the resigned. To close a rating of “poor”, the scholar embraces few of the concepts and key points of the text/s and Learning Resources. The minority is dropping specialty and specificity and/or does not embrace any just examples or agree suited declaration from the readings.

 

 

 

(0–14 points)

 

Provides direction on how to test websites and instrument delay trustworthy notification on the end.

 

 

 

 

 

(20 practicable points)

This minority demonstrates excellence.  To close a rating of “excellent” the scholar must argue all of the concepts and key points presented in the text/s and Learning Resources.  The minority agrees forcible specialty including multiple bearing examples, declaration from the readings and other mate reviewed sources published delayin the late 5 years, and ardent ideas.

 

(1920 points)

This minority demonstrates a good understanding of the resigned. To close a rating of “good” the scholar must argue most of the concepts and key points presented in the text/s and Learning Resources. The minority embraces temperate specialty, declaration from the readings, and ardent ideas.

 

 

 

 

 

 

(17–18 points)

This minority demonstrates a fairunderstanding of the resigned.  To close a rating of “fair” the scholar must argue some of the concepts and key points as presented in the text/s and Learning Resources. The minority may be scant in specialty and specificity and/or may not embrace suited just examples or agree suited declaration from the readings.

 

 

 

 

 

(15–16 points)

This minority demonstrates poor understanding of the resigned. To close a rating of “poor”, the scholar embraces few of the concepts and key points of the text/s and Learning Resources. The minority is dropping specialty and specificity and/or does not embrace any just examples or agree suited declaration from the readings.

 

 

 

(0–14 points)

 

Recommends 4-5 websites delay obvious, precious, and certain notification on the end.

 

 

 

 

 

 (10 practicable points)

This minority demonstrates excellence.  To close a rating of “excellent” the scholar must argue all of the concepts and key points presented in the text/s and Learning Resources.  The minority agrees forcible specialty including multiple bearing examples, declaration from the readings and other mate reviewed sources published delayin the late 5 years, and ardent ideas.

 

(910 points)

This minority demonstrates a good understanding of the resigned. To close a rating of “good” the scholar must argue most of the concepts and key points presented in the text/s and Learning Resources. The minority embraces temperate specialty, declaration from the readings, and ardent ideas.

 

 

 

 

 

 

(8 points)

 

This minority demonstrates a fairunderstanding of the resigned.  To close a rating of “fair” the scholar must argue some of the concepts and key points as presented in the text/s and Learning Resources. The minority may be scant in specialty and specificity and/or may not embrace suited just examples or agree suited declaration from the readings.

 

 

 

 

 

(7 points)

This minority demonstrates poor understanding of the resigned. To close a rating of “poor”, the scholar embraces few of the concepts and key points of the text/s and Learning Resources. The minority is dropping specialty and specificity and/or does not embrace any just examples or agree suited declaration from the readings.

 

 

 

(0–6 points)

 

Writing used in Introduction

 

 

 

 

 

(10 practicable points)

Paper is well organized, uses conversant drift, follows APA name, uses ancient despatches and personal paraphrasing, embraces very few or no despatches and/or spelling errors, and is fully congruous delay furrow roll despatches name. Prelude embraces multiple, alienate and praiseworthy mate reviewed sources (published delayin the late 5 years) expected/required for the ordinance.

 

(9–10 points)

Paper is mostly congruous delay furrow roll despatches name. Paper may feel some diminutive or choice construction, conversant drift, or APA name ends, and/or may embrace a few despatches and spelling errors, and/or subordinately close than the expected enumerate of or archearchetype of sources.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(8 points)

Paper is subordinately below furrow roll despatches name, delay multiple diminutiveer or a few superior problems. Paper may be scant in construction, conversant drift, APA name, and/or embrace frequent despatches and/or spelling errors, or shows temperate confidence on quoting vs. ancient despatches and paraphrasing. Paper may embrace supplemental instrument (enumerate or disposition).

 

 

 

 

 

(7 points)

Paper is well below furrow roll despatches name expectations for construction, conversant drift, APA name, and despatches, or relies excessively on quoting. Paper may embrace few or no disposition instrument.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(0–6 points)

     

Writing used in Flyer

 

 

 

 

 

(20 practicable points)

Flyer is well organized, uses a drift alienate for the parley, uses ancient despatches and personal paraphrasing, embraces very few or no despatches and/or spelling errors, and is fully congruous delay a soundness flyer despatches name.

 

 

 

(18–20 points)

 

Flyer mostly uses a drift alienate for the prepared parley. Flyer may feel some diminutive or choice construction, drift ends, and/or may embrace a few despatches and spelling errors.

 

 

 

 

 

(16–17 points)

Flyer is written in a drift that is subordinately overhead or below the prepared parley, delay multiple diminutiveer or a few superior problems. Flyer may be scant in construction, alienate drift, and/or embrace frequent despatches and/or spelling errors, or shows temperate confidence on quoting vs. ancient despatches and paraphrasing.

 

(14–15 points)

 

Flyer is well below furrow roll exertion, expectations for construction, alienate drift, and despatches.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(0–13 points)

 

Instructor comments:      

 

Up to 20 points may be deducted for lateness.

 

   

Total Score (100 practicable points):

      points

Order a unique copy of this paper
(550 words)

Approximate price: $22

Basic features
  • Free title page and bibliography
  • Unlimited revisions
  • Plagiarism-free guarantee
  • Money-back guarantee
  • 24/7 support
On-demand options
  • Writer’s samples
  • Part-by-part delivery
  • Overnight delivery
  • Copies of used sources
  • Expert Proofreading
Paper format
  • 275 words per page
  • 12 pt Arial/Times New Roman
  • Double line spacing
  • Any citation style (APA, MLA, Chicago/Turabian, Harvard)

Our guarantees

Delivering a high-quality product at a reasonable price is not enough anymore.
That’s why we have developed 5 beneficial guarantees that will make your experience with our service enjoyable, easy, and safe.

Money-back guarantee

You have to be 100% sure of the quality of your product to give a money-back guarantee. This describes us perfectly. Make sure that this guarantee is totally transparent.

Read more

Zero-plagiarism guarantee

Each paper is composed from scratch, according to your instructions. It is then checked by our plagiarism-detection software. There is no gap where plagiarism could squeeze in.

Read more

Free-revision policy

Thanks to our free revisions, there is no way for you to be unsatisfied. We will work on your paper until you are completely happy with the result.

Read more

Privacy policy

Your email is safe, as we store it according to international data protection rules. Your bank details are secure, as we use only reliable payment systems.

Read more

Fair-cooperation guarantee

By sending us your money, you buy the service we provide. Check out our terms and conditions if you prefer business talks to be laid out in official language.

Read more

Calculate the price of your order

550 words
We'll send you the first draft for approval by September 11, 2018 at 10:52 AM
Total price:
$26
The price is based on these factors:
Academic level
Number of pages
Urgency