Nursing

NURS 6003/NURS 6003A/NURS 6003F/NRSE 6003C/NURS 6003N/NURS 6003C: Transition to Graduate Study for Nursing

· Module 4

Assignment: Academic Success and Functional Development Plan Part 4: Elaboration Analysis

Architect Daniel Libeskind is credited after a while maxim “To procure meaningful erection is not to travesty truth, but to sonorous it.” The prompting is that his employment does not delineation the efforts of others but relies on it.

Understanding the employment of others is delicately influential to new employment. Contributions to the nursing organization of familiarity can bechance when you are cogent to dissect and sonorous the efforts of anterior elaboration. Elaboration segregation skills are hence delicate instruments for your instrumentbox.

In this Assignment, you conquer lodge applicable true elaboration. You so conquer dissect this elaboration using a instrument beneficial for segregation.

To Prepare:

· Mirror on the strategies presented in the Media this Module's Learning Media in maintenance of locating and analyzing elaboration.

· Use the Walden Library to fulfill and peruse one peer-reviewed elaboration condition focused on a theme in your specialty room that shares you.

· Review the condition you chosen and mirror on the functional habit use of theories/concepts forcible by the condition.

The Assignment:

Using the “Module 4 | Part 4” individuality of your Academic Success and Functional Development Plan Template presented in the Resources, inaugurate an segregation of the elements of the elaboration condition you authorized. Be certain to embrace the flourishing:

· Your theme of share.

· A decently formatted APA extract of the condition you chosen, acrave after a while associate or quest specialtys.

· Fulfill a functional habit use of the theories/concepts presented in the condition.

· Segregation of the condition using the “Request Segregation Matrix” individuality of the template

· Write a 1-paragraph plea stating whether you would praise this condition to instruct functional habit.

· Write a 2- to 3-paragraph resume that you conquer add to your Academic Success and Functional Development Plan that embraces the flourishing:

· Describe your path to fulfilling and analyzing peer-reviewed elaboration.

· Fulfill at last two strategies that you would use that you rest to be cogent in answer peer-reviewed elaboration.

· Fulfill at last one riches you hint to use in the forthcoming to furnish peer-reviewed elaboration.

e: NURS_6003_Module04_Week07_Assignment_Rubric

· Grid View

· List View

ExcellentGoodFairPoor
Using the Week 4 Part 4 individuality of your Academic Success and Functional Development Plan Template presented in the Resources, inaugurate an segregation of the elements of the elaboration condition you authorized. Be certain to embrace the flourishing: ·   The theme of share you entertain chosen. ·   Properly formatted APA extract of the condition you chosen, acrave after a while associate or quest specialtys. ·   Fulfill a functional habit use of the theories/concepts presented in the condition.18 (18%) - 20 (20%) The counter-argument distinctly identifies the theme of share chosen. The counter-argument complimentaryly and altogether procures a extract of the condition chosen, including an complimentary and entire associate or powerful quest specialtys. The counter-argument distinctly identifies and describes in specialty a functional habit use of the theories/concepts presented in the condition.16 (16%) - 17 (17%) The counter-argument insufficiently identifies the theme of share chosen. The counter-argument procures a peculiar extract of the condition chosen, including a peculiar associate or quest specialtys. The counter-argument insufficiently identifies and describes a functional habit use of the theories/concepts presented in the condition.14 (14%) - 15 (15%) The counter-argument intangiblely identifies the theme of share chosen. The counter-argument intangiblely or incompletely procures a extract of the condition chosen, including intangible or incomplimentary quest specialtys. The counter-argument intangiblely or incompletely identifies and describes a functional habit use of the theories/concepts presented in the condition.0 (0%) - 13 (13%) The counter-argument intangiblely and incompletely identifies the theme of share chosen, or is detriment. The counter-argument intangiblely and incompletely procures a extract of the condition chosen, including intangible and incomplimentary quest specialtys, or is detriment. The counter-argument intangiblely and incompletely identifies and describes a functional habit use of the theories/concepts presented in the condition, or is detriment.
Analysis of the condition using the Elaboration Segregation Matrix individuality of the template. ·   Write a one-paragraph plea explaining whether or not you would praise the use of this condition to instruct functional habit.18 (18%) - 20 (20%) The counter-argument distinctly and complimentaryly procures a specialtyed segregation of the condition using the Elaboration Segregation Matrix individuality of the template. The counter-argument distinctly and complimentaryly explains in specialty the plea of whether or not to praise the use of the condition to instruct functional habit.16 (16%) - 17 (17%) The counter-argument procures a peculiar segregation of the condition using the Elaboration Segregation Matrix individuality of the template. The counter-argument insufficiently explains the plea of whether or not to praise the use of the condition to instruct functional habit.14 (14%) - 15 (15%) The counter-argument procures a intangible or incomplimentary segregation of the condition using the Elaboration Segregation Matrix individuality of the template. The counter-argument intangiblely or incompletely explains the plea of whether or not to praise the use of the condition to instruct functional habit.0 (0%) - 13 (13%) The counter-argument procures a intangible and incomplimentary segregation of the condition using the Elaboration Segregation Matrix individuality of the template, or is detriment. The counter-argument intangiblely and incompletely explains the plea of whether or not to praise the use of the condition to instruct functional habit, or is detriment.
Write a 2-3 paragraph resume that you conquer add to your Academic Success and Functional Development Plan that embraces the flourishing: ·   Describe your path to fulfilling and analyzing peer-reviewed elaboration. ·   Fulfill at last two strategies that you would use that you rest to be cogent in answer peer-reviewed elaboration. ·   Fulfill at last one riches you hint to use in the forthcoming to furnish peer-reviewed elaboration.41 (41%) - 45 (45%) The counter-argument distinctly and complimentaryly describes in specialty the path to fulfilling and analyzing peer-reviewed elaboration. The counter-argument distinctly identifies and complimentaryly describes in specialty at last two strategies used to be cogent in answer peer-reviewed elaboration. The counter-argument procures a entire, specialtyed, and particular structure of at last one after a whileout riches that may be used in the forthcoming to furnish peer-reviewed elaboration. The counter-argument abundantly incorporates at last 1 after a whileout riches and 2-3 method particular richess that abundantly maintenances the resume procured.36 (36%) - 40 (40%) The counter-argument insufficiently describes the path to fulfilling and analyzing peer-reviewed elaboration. The counter-argument insufficiently identifies and describes at last two strategies used to be cogent in answer peer-reviewed elaboration. The counter-argument procures an complimentary structure of at last one after a whileout riches that may be used in the forthcoming to furnish peer-reviewed elaboration. The counter-argument incorporates at last 1 after a whileout riches and 2-3 method particular richess that maintenance the resume procured.32 (32%) - 35 (35%) The counter-argument intangiblely or incompletely describes the path to fulfilling and analyzing peer-reviewed elaboration. The counter-argument intangiblely or incompletely identifies and describes at last two strategies used to be cogent in answer peer-reviewed elaboration. The counter-argument intangiblely or incompletely synthesizes at last one after a whileout riches that may be used in the forthcoming to furnish peer-reviewed elaboration. The counter-argument minimally incorporates richess that may maintenance the resume procured.0 (0%) - 31 (31%) The counter-argument intangiblely and incompletely describes the path to fulfilling and analyzing peer-reviewed elaboration, or is detriment. The counter-argument intangiblely and incompletely identifies and describes at last two strategies used to be cogent in answer peer-reviewed elaboration, or is detriment. The counter-argument fails to incorporate any richess that may be used in the forthcoming to furnish peer-reviewed elaboration to maintenance the resume procured, or is detriment.
Written Expression and Formatting - Paragraph Development and Organization: Paragraphs bring-about manifest points that maintenance well-mannered-mannered exposed ideas, glide logically, and evince simultaneousness of ideas. Sentences are careabundantly focused--neither crave and detached nor slight and scant pith. A manifest and large scope announcement and presentation is procured which delineates all required criteria.5 (5%) - 5 (5%) Paragraphs and sentences flourish answerableness standards for glide, simultaneousness, and clarity. A manifest and large scope announcement, presentation, and disposal is procured which delineates all required criteria.4 (4%) - 4 (4%) Paragraphs and sentences flourish answerableness standards for glide, simultaneousness, and clarity 80% of the spell. Purpose, presentation, and disposal of the provision is systematic, yet is slight and not picturesquely.3.5 (3.5%) - 3.5 (3.5%) Paragraphs and sentences flourish answerableness standards for glide, simultaneousness, and clarity 60%- 79% of the spell. Purpose, presentation, and disposal of the provision is intangible or off theme.0 (0%) - 3 (3%) Paragraphs and sentences flourish answerableness standards for glide, simultaneousness, and clarity < 60% of the spell. No scope announcement, presentation, or disposal was procured.
Written Expression and Formatting - English answerableness standards: Reform language, mechanics, and decent punctuation5 (5%) - 5 (5%) Uses reform language, spelling, and punctuation after a while no errors.4 (4%) - 4 (4%) Contains a few (1-2) language, spelling, and punctuation errors.3.5 (3.5%) - 3.5 (3.5%) Contains different (3-4) language, spelling, and punctuation errors.0 (0%) - 3 (3%) Contains abundant (≥ 5) language, spelling, and punctuation errors that quarrel after a while the peruseer’s intellect.
Written Expression and Formatting - The disquisition flourishs reform APA format for denomination page, crownings, font, spacing, margins, indentations, page aggregate, general crown, parenthetical/in-text extracts, and intimation roll.5 (5%) - 5 (5%) Uses reform APA format after a while no errors.4 (4%) - 4 (4%) Contains a few (1-2) APA format errors.3.5 (3.5%) - 3.5 (3.5%) Contains different (3-4) APA format errors.0 (0%) - 3 (3%) Contains abundant (≥ 5) APA format errors.
Total Points: 100

Name: NURS_6003_Module04_Week07_Assignment_Rubric

Credible Online Sources Credible Sources for Nursing Information as procured in class:

SOURCES TO USE

o HON code: https://www.hon.ch/en/ o ANA: https://www.nursingworld.org/ o UpToDate https://www.uptodate.com/contents/quest o U.S Department of Health & Human Services: https://www.hhs.gov/ o Google Scholar : https://scholar.google.com/ o NIH: National Library of Medicine

(https://www.nlm.nih.gov/portals/healthcare.html) o NIH: https://www.nih.gov/ o Medline Plus: https://medlineplus.gov/ o Health Media & Services Administration (HRSA): https://www.hrsa.gov/ o Agency for Healthcare Elaboration and Quality (AHRQ): https://www.ahrq.gov/ o Healthy People 2020: https://www.healthypeople.gov/ o Mayo Clinic: https://www.mayoclinic.org/patient-care-and-health-information o Cochrane: https://www.cochrane.org/ o PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/ o The Joint Commission: https://www.jointcommission.org/ o Census: https://data.census.gov/cedsci/ o Pew Elaboration Center: https://www.pewresearch.org/

https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/writingcenter/webinars/technical
https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/az.php?s=19981
https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/library/evaluating/resource-types/journals
Order a unique copy of this paper
(550 words)

Approximate price: $22

Basic features
  • Free title page and bibliography
  • Unlimited revisions
  • Plagiarism-free guarantee
  • Money-back guarantee
  • 24/7 support
On-demand options
  • Writer’s samples
  • Part-by-part delivery
  • Overnight delivery
  • Copies of used sources
  • Expert Proofreading
Paper format
  • 275 words per page
  • 12 pt Arial/Times New Roman
  • Double line spacing
  • Any citation style (APA, MLA, Chicago/Turabian, Harvard)

Our guarantees

Delivering a high-quality product at a reasonable price is not enough anymore.
That’s why we have developed 5 beneficial guarantees that will make your experience with our service enjoyable, easy, and safe.

Money-back guarantee

You have to be 100% sure of the quality of your product to give a money-back guarantee. This describes us perfectly. Make sure that this guarantee is totally transparent.

Read more

Zero-plagiarism guarantee

Each paper is composed from scratch, according to your instructions. It is then checked by our plagiarism-detection software. There is no gap where plagiarism could squeeze in.

Read more

Free-revision policy

Thanks to our free revisions, there is no way for you to be unsatisfied. We will work on your paper until you are completely happy with the result.

Read more

Privacy policy

Your email is safe, as we store it according to international data protection rules. Your bank details are secure, as we use only reliable payment systems.

Read more

Fair-cooperation guarantee

By sending us your money, you buy the service we provide. Check out our terms and conditions if you prefer business talks to be laid out in official language.

Read more

Calculate the price of your order

550 words
We'll send you the first draft for approval by September 11, 2018 at 10:52 AM
Total price:
$26
The price is based on these factors:
Academic level
Number of pages
Urgency