Nursing

NURS 6003/NURS 6003A/NURS 6003F/NRSE 6003C/NURS 6003N/NURS 6003C: Transition to Graduate Study for Nursing

· Module 4

Assignment: Academic Success and Negotiative Development Plan Part 4: Inquiry Analysis

Architect Daniel Libeskind is credited after a while declaration “To afford meaningful edifice is not to burlesque truth, but to sonorous it.” The impulse is that his toil does not delineation the efforts of others but relies on it.

Understanding the toil of others is exactly pertinent to new toil. Contributions to the nursing substantiality of notifyation can happen when you are powerful to criticise and sonorous the efforts of former inquiry. Inquiry resolution skills are accordingly exact dupes for your dupebox.

In this Assignment, you obtain lodge pertinent real inquiry. You too obtain criticise this inquiry using a dupe advantageous for resolution.

To Prepare:

· Muse on the strategies presented in the Instrument this Module's Learning Instrument in prop of locating and analyzing inquiry.

· Use the Walden Library to authenticate and learn one peer-reviewed inquiry boundary focused on a subject in your point opportunity that causes you.

· Review the boundary you clarified and muse on the negotiative habit use of theories/concepts picturesquely by the boundary.

The Assignment:

Using the “Module 4 | Part 4” individuality of your Academic Success and Negotiative Development Plan Template presented in the Resources, inaugurate an resolution of the elements of the inquiry boundary you authorized. Be infallible to grasp the ensueing:

· Your subject of cause.

· A suitably formatted APA passage of the boundary you clarified, ahanker after a while delay or inquiry components.

· Authenticate a negotiative habit use of the theories/concepts presented in the boundary.

· Resolution of the boundary using the “Reinquiry Resolution Matrix” individuality of the template

· Write a 1-passage maintenance stating whether you would confide this boundary to notify negotiative habit.

· Write a 2- to 3-passage resume that you obtain add to your Academic Success and Negotiative Development Plan that grasps the ensueing:

· Describe your admittance to authenticateing and analyzing peer-reviewed inquiry.

· Authenticate at smallest two strategies that you would use that you set to be powerful in answer peer-reviewed inquiry.

· Authenticate at smallest one material you intention to use in the advenient to experience peer-reviewed inquiry.

e: NURS_6003_Module04_Week07_Assignment_Rubric

· Grid View

· List View

ExcellentGoodFairPoor
Using the Week 4 Part 4 individuality of your Academic Success and Negotiative Development Plan Template presented in the Resources, inaugurate an resolution of the elements of the inquiry boundary you authorized. Be infallible to grasp the ensueing: ·   The subject of cause you enjoy clarified. ·   Suitably formatted APA passage of the boundary you clarified, ahanker after a while delay or inquiry components. ·   Authenticate a negotiative habit use of the theories/concepts presented in the boundary.18 (18%) - 20 (20%) The counterpart evidently identifies the subject of cause clarified. The counterpart precisely and wholly affords a passage of the boundary clarified, including an accurate and perfect delay or consummate inquiry components. The counterpart evidently identifies and describes in component a negotiative habit use of the theories/concepts presented in the boundary.16 (16%) - 17 (17%) The counterpart imperfectly identifies the subject of cause clarified. The counterpart affords a restricted passage of the boundary clarified, including a restricted delay or inquiry components. The counterpart imperfectly identifies and describes a negotiative habit use of the theories/concepts presented in the boundary.14 (14%) - 15 (15%) The counterpart equivocally identifies the subject of cause clarified. The counterpart equivocally or loosely affords a passage of the boundary clarified, including equivocal or loose inquiry components. The counterpart equivocally or loosely identifies and describes a negotiative habit use of the theories/concepts presented in the boundary.0 (0%) - 13 (13%) The counterpart equivocally and loosely identifies the subject of cause clarified, or is dropping. The counterpart equivocally and loosely affords a passage of the boundary clarified, including equivocal and loose inquiry components, or is dropping. The counterpart equivocally and loosely identifies and describes a negotiative habit use of the theories/concepts presented in the boundary, or is dropping.
Analysis of the boundary using the Inquiry Resolution Matrix individuality of the template. ·   Write a one-passage maintenance explaining whether or not you would confide the use of this boundary to notify negotiative habit.18 (18%) - 20 (20%) The counterpart evidently and precisely affords a componented resolution of the boundary using the Inquiry Resolution Matrix individuality of the template. The counterpart evidently and precisely explains in component the maintenance of whether or not to confide the use of the boundary to notify negotiative habit.16 (16%) - 17 (17%) The counterpart affords a restricted resolution of the boundary using the Inquiry Resolution Matrix individuality of the template. The counterpart imperfectly explains the maintenance of whether or not to confide the use of the boundary to notify negotiative habit.14 (14%) - 15 (15%) The counterpart affords a equivocal or loose resolution of the boundary using the Inquiry Resolution Matrix individuality of the template. The counterpart equivocally or loosely explains the maintenance of whether or not to confide the use of the boundary to notify negotiative habit.0 (0%) - 13 (13%) The counterpart affords a equivocal and loose resolution of the boundary using the Inquiry Resolution Matrix individuality of the template, or is dropping. The counterpart equivocally and loosely explains the maintenance of whether or not to confide the use of the boundary to notify negotiative habit, or is dropping.
Write a 2-3 passage resume that you obtain add to your Academic Success and Negotiative Development Plan that grasps the ensueing: ·   Describe your admittance to authenticateing and analyzing peer-reviewed inquiry. ·   Authenticate at smallest two strategies that you would use that you set to be powerful in answer peer-reviewed inquiry. ·   Authenticate at smallest one material you intention to use in the advenient to experience peer-reviewed inquiry.41 (41%) - 45 (45%) The counterpart evidently and precisely describes in component the admittance to authenticateing and analyzing peer-reviewed inquiry. The counterpart evidently identifies and precisely describes in component at smallest two strategies used to be powerful in answer peer-reviewed inquiry. The counterpart affords a perfect, componented, and inequitable union of at smallest one after a whileout material that may be used in the advenient to experience peer-reviewed inquiry. The counterpart largely incorporates at smallest 1 after a whileout material and 2-3 race inequitable materials that largely props the resume affordd.36 (36%) - 40 (40%) The counterpart imperfectly describes the admittance to authenticateing and analyzing peer-reviewed inquiry. The counterpart imperfectly identifies and describes at smallest two strategies used to be powerful in answer peer-reviewed inquiry. The counterpart affords an accurate union of at smallest one after a whileout material that may be used in the advenient to experience peer-reviewed inquiry. The counterpart incorporates at smallest 1 after a whileout material and 2-3 race inequitable materials that prop the resume affordd.32 (32%) - 35 (35%) The counterpart equivocally or loosely describes the admittance to authenticateing and analyzing peer-reviewed inquiry. The counterpart equivocally or loosely identifies and describes at smallest two strategies used to be powerful in answer peer-reviewed inquiry. The counterpart equivocally or loosely synthesizes at smallest one after a whileout material that may be used in the advenient to experience peer-reviewed inquiry. The counterpart minimally incorporates materials that may prop the resume affordd.0 (0%) - 31 (31%) The counterpart equivocally and loosely describes the admittance to authenticateing and analyzing peer-reviewed inquiry, or is dropping. The counterpart equivocally and loosely identifies and describes at smallest two strategies used to be powerful in answer peer-reviewed inquiry, or is dropping. The counterpart fails to incorporate any materials that may be used in the advenient to experience peer-reviewed inquiry to prop the resume affordd, or is dropping.
Written Expression and Formatting - Passage Development and Organization: Paragraphs bring-about disengaged points that prop well-behaved-behaved patent open ideas, course logically, and teach simultaneousness of ideas. Sentences are carelargely focused--neither hanker and rambling nor blunt and rare body. A disengaged and all intention proposition and presentation is affordd which delineates all required criteria.5 (5%) - 5 (5%) Paragraphs and sentences ensue answerableness standards for course, simultaneousness, and clarity. A disengaged and all intention proposition, presentation, and blank is affordd which delineates all required criteria.4 (4%) - 4 (4%) Paragraphs and sentences ensue answerableness standards for course, simultaneousness, and clarity 80% of the occasion. Purpose, presentation, and blank of the ordinance is normal, yet is slight and not picturesquely.3.5 (3.5%) - 3.5 (3.5%) Paragraphs and sentences ensue answerableness standards for course, simultaneousness, and clarity 60%- 79% of the occasion. Purpose, presentation, and blank of the ordinance is equivocal or off subject.0 (0%) - 3 (3%) Paragraphs and sentences ensue answerableness standards for course, simultaneousness, and clarity < 60% of the occasion. No intention proposition, presentation, or blank was affordd.
Written Expression and Formatting - English answerableness standards: Punish phraseology, mechanics, and right punctuation5 (5%) - 5 (5%) Uses punish phraseology, spelling, and punctuation after a while no errors.4 (4%) - 4 (4%) Contains a few (1-2) phraseology, spelling, and punctuation errors.3.5 (3.5%) - 3.5 (3.5%) Contains different (3-4) phraseology, spelling, and punctuation errors.0 (0%) - 3 (3%) Contains sundry (≥ 5) phraseology, spelling, and punctuation errors that clash after a while the learner’s mind.
Written Expression and Formatting - The monograph ensues punish APA format for denomination page, topicings, font, spacing, margins, indentations, page gum, popular topic, parenthetical/in-text passages, and relation roll.5 (5%) - 5 (5%) Uses punish APA format after a while no errors.4 (4%) - 4 (4%) Contains a few (1-2) APA format errors.3.5 (3.5%) - 3.5 (3.5%) Contains different (3-4) APA format errors.0 (0%) - 3 (3%) Contains sundry (≥ 5) APA format errors.
Total Points: 100

Name: NURS_6003_Module04_Week07_Assignment_Rubric

Credible Online Sources Credible Sources for Nursing Information as affordd in class:

SOURCES TO USE

o HON code: https://www.hon.ch/en/ o ANA: https://www.nursingworld.org/ o UpToDate https://www.uptodate.com/contents/inquiry o U.S Department of Health & Human Services: https://www.hhs.gov/ o Google Scholar : https://scholar.google.com/ o NIH: National Library of Medicine

(https://www.nlm.nih.gov/portals/healthcare.html) o NIH: https://www.nih.gov/ o Medline Plus: https://medlineplus.gov/ o Health Instrument & Services Administration (HRSA): https://www.hrsa.gov/ o Agency for Healthcare Inquiry and Quality (AHRQ): https://www.ahrq.gov/ o Healthy People 2020: https://www.healthypeople.gov/ o Mayo Clinic: https://www.mayoclinic.org/patient-care-and-health-information o Cochrane: https://www.cochrane.org/ o PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/ o The Joint Commission: https://www.jointcommission.org/ o Census: https://data.census.gov/cedsci/ o Pew Inquiry Center: https://www.pewresearch.org/

https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/writingcenter/webinars/technical
https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/az.php?s=19981
https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/library/evaluating/resource-types/journals
Order a unique copy of this paper
(550 words)

Approximate price: $22

Basic features
  • Free title page and bibliography
  • Unlimited revisions
  • Plagiarism-free guarantee
  • Money-back guarantee
  • 24/7 support
On-demand options
  • Writer’s samples
  • Part-by-part delivery
  • Overnight delivery
  • Copies of used sources
  • Expert Proofreading
Paper format
  • 275 words per page
  • 12 pt Arial/Times New Roman
  • Double line spacing
  • Any citation style (APA, MLA, Chicago/Turabian, Harvard)

Our guarantees

Delivering a high-quality product at a reasonable price is not enough anymore.
That’s why we have developed 5 beneficial guarantees that will make your experience with our service enjoyable, easy, and safe.

Money-back guarantee

You have to be 100% sure of the quality of your product to give a money-back guarantee. This describes us perfectly. Make sure that this guarantee is totally transparent.

Read more

Zero-plagiarism guarantee

Each paper is composed from scratch, according to your instructions. It is then checked by our plagiarism-detection software. There is no gap where plagiarism could squeeze in.

Read more

Free-revision policy

Thanks to our free revisions, there is no way for you to be unsatisfied. We will work on your paper until you are completely happy with the result.

Read more

Privacy policy

Your email is safe, as we store it according to international data protection rules. Your bank details are secure, as we use only reliable payment systems.

Read more

Fair-cooperation guarantee

By sending us your money, you buy the service we provide. Check out our terms and conditions if you prefer business talks to be laid out in official language.

Read more

Calculate the price of your order

550 words
We'll send you the first draft for approval by September 11, 2018 at 10:52 AM
Total price:
$26
The price is based on these factors:
Academic level
Number of pages
Urgency