Nursing assignment: ethical concerns | Applied Sciences homework help

As an past action nourish, you get run into situations where a resigned’s wishes environing his or her bloom encounter delay indication, your own knowledge, or a origin’s wishes. This may imagine an ghostly difficulty. What do you do when these situations supervene?

In this Discussion, you get ponder indication-based action leadlines and ghostly considerations for specific scenarios.

Scenario 1:

A uncombined woman has accompanied her two daughters, primeval 15 and 13, to a women’s bloom clinic and has requested that the lasss assent-to a pelvic test and be put on origin curb. The lasss own consented to the exam but appear intangible.

Scenario 2:

A 17-year-old boy has succeed in for a check-up succeeding a section damnification during a football play. He has implied that he would enjoy to be cogent to play in the proximate play, which is in 3 days.

Scenario 3:

A 12-year-old lass has succeed in for a method check-up and has not yet assent-tod the HPV vaccine. Her origin is very divine and believes that the vaccine would submit premarital sexual earnestness.

Scenario 4:

A 57-year-old man who was diagnosed delay motor neuron indisposition 2 years ago is experiencing a swift refuse in his circumstances. He prefers to be admitted to the in-resigned individual at a hospice to assent-to end-of-life preservation, but his helpmate wants him to wait at abode.

To prepare:

·         Select three scenarios, and consider on the symbolical presented throughout this progress.

·         What certain advice would insufficiency to be obtained environing the resigned through bloom assessments and symptom tests?

·         Consider how you would reply as an past action nourish. Review indication-based action leadlines and ghostly considerations appliccogent to the scenarios you chosen.

Questions to be addressed in my paper:

1.     The explication of the bloom assessment advice required for a distinction of your chosen resigneds (grasp the scenario gum).

2.     Explain how you would reply to the scenario as an past action nourish using indication-based action leadlines and applying ghostly considerations. Justify your responses.

3.     Summary delay Conclusion





1)      2-3 pages (addressing the 3 doubts aloft save the designation page and relation page).

2)      Kindly supervene APA format for the extract and relations! References should be among the date of 2011 and 2016. Please economize the relations at smallest three under as abundantly as feasible and the security from yours.

3)     Make sectionings for each doubt.




·         Ball, J. W., Dains, J. E., Flynn, J. A., Solomon, B. S., & Stewart, R. W. (2015). Seidel's lead to natural test (8th ed.). St. Louis, MO: Elsevier Mosby.

o    Chapter 23, “Sports Community Evaluation” (pp. 581-593)

In this paragraph, the authors narrate the way of a sports community evaluation. The paragraph too states the most contemptible circumstancess encountered in a sports community evaluation.

o    Chapter 24, “Putting It All Together” (pp. 594-609)

In this paragraph, the authors tie contemporaneously the concepts introduced in former paragraphs. In feature, the paragraph has a hale argument on the resigned-caregiver analogy.

o    Review of Paragraph 16, “Breasts and Axillae” (pp. 350-369)

o    Review of Paragraph 18, “Female Genitalia” (pp. 416-465)

·         Sullivan, D. D. (2012). Guide to clinical documentation (2nd ed.). Philadelphia, PA: F. A. Davis.

o    Chapter 6, "Outresigned Charting and Communications" ("Advanced Directives"; pp. 128–129)

o    Chapter 9, "Discharging Patients from the Hospital" (pp. 189–207)

·         Burger, I. M., & Kass, N. E. (2009). Screening in the dark: Ghostly considerations of providing screening tests to individuals when indication is scant to influence screening populations. American Journal of Bioethics, 9(4), 3–14.
Retrieved from the Walden Library databases.

This season recommends how physicians should reply when new screening tests evene in the marketplace. The authors discuss how indication influences resolution making for screening.

·         De Jong, A., Dondorp, W. J., de Die-Smulders, C. E., Frints, S. G. M., & de Wert, G. M. (2010). Non-invasive prenatal testing: Ghostly issues ponderd. European Journal of Human Genetics, 18(3), 272–277. 
Retrieved from the Walden Library databases.

The authors of this season discuss the ghostly consequences of non-invasive prenatal symptom tests. Specifically, the season narrates the property the tests may own on abortions.

·         Rourke, L., Leduc, D., Constantin, E., Carsley, S., & Rourke, J. (2010). Update on well-baby and well-branch preservation from 0 to 5 years: What’s new in the Rourke Baby Record? Canadian Origin Physician,56(12), 1285–1290.
Retrieved from the Walden Library databases.

In this season, the authors yield an overview of and evaluate the peculiarity of indication in the 2009 Rourke Baby Record.

·         Womack, J. (2010). Give your sports naturals a exploit boost. The Journal of Origin Practice,59(8), 437–444.
Retrieved from the Walden Library databases.

This season explains how to inaugurate a entire medical truth and targeted natural exam. The season revolves encircling the use of the 4th edition of the Precommunity Natural Evaluation.

·         American Academy of Pediatrics. (2008). Recommendations for regulative pediatric bloom preservation (periodicity register). 
Retrieved from

This produce provides recommendations for regulative pediatric bloom preservation from infancy through young-person. The dateicity register covers a diversity of areas from bloom truth to measurements, developmental/behavispoken screenings, natural exams, procedural screenings, and spoken bloom.

·         Rourke, L., Leduc, D., & Rourke, J. (2011). Rourke Baby Record. Retrieved from 

This website provides advice on the Rourke Baby Record (RBR). The RBR produce leadlines on development and feeding, developmental surveillance, natural exam parameters, and immunizations for well-baby and branch preservation.



Order a unique copy of this paper
(550 words)

Approximate price: $22

Basic features
  • Free title page and bibliography
  • Unlimited revisions
  • Plagiarism-free guarantee
  • Money-back guarantee
  • 24/7 support
On-demand options
  • Writer’s samples
  • Part-by-part delivery
  • Overnight delivery
  • Copies of used sources
  • Expert Proofreading
Paper format
  • 275 words per page
  • 12 pt Arial/Times New Roman
  • Double line spacing
  • Any citation style (APA, MLA, Chicago/Turabian, Harvard)

Our guarantees

Delivering a high-quality product at a reasonable price is not enough anymore.
That’s why we have developed 5 beneficial guarantees that will make your experience with our service enjoyable, easy, and safe.

Money-back guarantee

You have to be 100% sure of the quality of your product to give a money-back guarantee. This describes us perfectly. Make sure that this guarantee is totally transparent.

Read more

Zero-plagiarism guarantee

Each paper is composed from scratch, according to your instructions. It is then checked by our plagiarism-detection software. There is no gap where plagiarism could squeeze in.

Read more

Free-revision policy

Thanks to our free revisions, there is no way for you to be unsatisfied. We will work on your paper until you are completely happy with the result.

Read more

Privacy policy

Your email is safe, as we store it according to international data protection rules. Your bank details are secure, as we use only reliable payment systems.

Read more

Fair-cooperation guarantee

By sending us your money, you buy the service we provide. Check out our terms and conditions if you prefer business talks to be laid out in official language.

Read more

Calculate the price of your order

550 words
We'll send you the first draft for approval by September 11, 2018 at 10:52 AM
Total price:
The price is based on these factors:
Academic level
Number of pages