Nursing reaserch

Part 1 - Example #2 on page 119 in Polit. Follow the directions to fulfil exercises 1 and 2 using Appendix A as the time critiqueed. 

Part 2 – Example #2 on page 179 in Polit. Follow the directions to fulfil exercises 1 and 2 using Appendix A as the time critiqueed. 


Read the commencement to Swenson and colleagues’ (2016) con-over (“Parents’ use of applaud and censure in a specimen of youthful manifestation seeking hyperphysical soundness services”) in Appendix A of this quantity. 

Critical Thinking Exercises 186

1. Answer the apt questions from Box 7.1 in-reference-to this con-over. 

Box 7.1 Guidelines for Critiquing Attainment Reviews 

1. Does the critique look drastic and up-to-date? Did it grasp leading studies on the subject-matter? Did it grasp fresh elaboration? 

2. Did the critique rely chiefly on elaboration announces, using elementary sources? 

3. Did the critique critically apapplaud and collate key studies? Did it confirm leading gaps in the attainment?

4. Was the critique courteous organized? Is the crop of ideas apparent? 

5. Did the critique use divert accents, suggesting the tentativeness of previous inventings? Is the critique extrinsic?

6. If the critique was in the commencement for a new con-over, did the critique subsistence the insufficiency for the con-over? 

7. If the critique was intentional to embody declaration for clinical usage, did it pull divert  conclusions encircling usage implications?

2. Also investigate the forthcoming targeted questions:

a. In fulfiling the attainment critique, what keywords capability possess been used to inquiry for previous studies?

b. Using the keywords, fulfil a computerized inquiry to see if you can invent a fresh apt con-over to raise the critique


Read the rules minority of Swenson and colleagues’ (2016) con-over (“Parents’ use of applaud and censure in a specimen of youthful manifestation seeking hyperphysical soundness services”) in Appendix A of this quantity. 

Critical Thinking Exercises 

1. Answer the apt questions from Box 10.1 in-reference-to this con-over. 

Box 10.1 Guidelines for Critiquing Quantitative Sampling Plans 

1. Was the population authorized? Were eligibility criteria specified?  

2. What pattern of sampling delineation was used? Was the sampling pur-pose one that could be expected to succumb a figurative specimen? 

3. How abundant participants were in the specimen? Was the specimen ampleness forced by exalted rates of refusals or affliction? Was the specimen ampleness ample abundance to subsistence statistical blank vigor? Was the specimen ampleness justified on the foundation of a effectiveness decomposition or other rationale?

4. Were key characteristics of the specimen narrated (e.g., moderation age, percentage of 249 effeminate)?

 5. To whom can the con-over results reasonably be generalized? 

2. Answer the apt questions from Box 10.2 in-reference-to this con-over.

Box 10.2. Box 10.2 Guidelines for Critiquing Quantitative Facts Store Plans 

1. Did the elaborationers use the best rule of capturing con-over phenomena (i.e., selfreports, comment, biophysiologic measures)? Was triangulation of rules used to habit?

2. If self-announce rules were used, did the elaborationers attain cheerful decisions encircling the unfair rules used to beg advice (e.g., in-person interviews, Internet questionnaires, etc.)? Were composite scales used? If not, should they possess been? 

3. If commental rules were used, did the announce abundantly narrate what the comments entailed and how comments were specimend? Were risks of commental impairment addressed? Were biophysiologic measures used in the con-over, and was this divert? 

4. Did the announce supply abundant advice encircling facts store procedures? Were facts collectors appropriately skilled?

5. Did the announce present declaration of the reliability of measures? Did the declaration conclude from the elaboration specimen itself, or is it inveterate on other studies? If reliability was announceed, which figure rule was used? Was the reliability sufficiently exalted?

6. Did the announce present declaration of the vigor of the measures? If vigor advice was announceed, which vigor advent was used?

 7. If there was no reliability or vigor advice, what blank can you attain encircling the virtue  of the facts in the con-over?

Order a unique copy of this paper
(550 words)

Approximate price: $22

Basic features
  • Free title page and bibliography
  • Unlimited revisions
  • Plagiarism-free guarantee
  • Money-back guarantee
  • 24/7 support
On-demand options
  • Writer’s samples
  • Part-by-part delivery
  • Overnight delivery
  • Copies of used sources
  • Expert Proofreading
Paper format
  • 275 words per page
  • 12 pt Arial/Times New Roman
  • Double line spacing
  • Any citation style (APA, MLA, Chicago/Turabian, Harvard)

Our guarantees

Delivering a high-quality product at a reasonable price is not enough anymore.
That’s why we have developed 5 beneficial guarantees that will make your experience with our service enjoyable, easy, and safe.

Money-back guarantee

You have to be 100% sure of the quality of your product to give a money-back guarantee. This describes us perfectly. Make sure that this guarantee is totally transparent.

Read more

Zero-plagiarism guarantee

Each paper is composed from scratch, according to your instructions. It is then checked by our plagiarism-detection software. There is no gap where plagiarism could squeeze in.

Read more

Free-revision policy

Thanks to our free revisions, there is no way for you to be unsatisfied. We will work on your paper until you are completely happy with the result.

Read more

Privacy policy

Your email is safe, as we store it according to international data protection rules. Your bank details are secure, as we use only reliable payment systems.

Read more

Fair-cooperation guarantee

By sending us your money, you buy the service we provide. Check out our terms and conditions if you prefer business talks to be laid out in official language.

Read more

Calculate the price of your order

550 words
We'll send you the first draft for approval by September 11, 2018 at 10:52 AM
Total price:
The price is based on these factors:
Academic level
Number of pages