PSYCHOLOGY

1. Your primal column (your rejoinder to the stuff-matter-matter) must inclose a quotation.  It is your ideas cheered by investigation. Please associate to the APA PowerPoint in the Student Resources section of the arrangeroom for notice on befitting formatting. There are Samples of APA Writing in the Getting Started area. There earn be a abatement of 20 tops for want  to citea fount amid your primal column and to prepare a associateence at the end of your primal column. 

2. Your primal column must be a insufficiency of 200 utterance and each rejoinder must be a insufficiency of 150 utterance. Please double-hinder your promise compute. Solely columns that converge the promise compute requirements take trustworthiness.

3. Column your promise compute at the end of each column. There earn be a 5-top abatement for each want to prepare a promise compute.

4. Please oration companion students and confessor by spectry. There earn be a 5-top abatement for each want to oration by spectry.

5. Please use spell hinder and befitting rhetoric. Points earn be deducted for each spelling and plain fallacy up to 10 tops for each column.  

PSYCHOLOGY DISCUSSION RUBRIC
CriteriaExemplary (100%) 50/50Above Average (89%) 45/ 50Satisfactory (79%) 40/ 50Approaches Standard (69%) 35/ 50Needs Correction (59%) 30/ 50Unsatisfactory (0) 0/ 50
Initial Column (50)Reveals authority of the embodied, important rate, and thoroughgoinggoing research of the stuff-stuff stuff. Demonstrates authority of rhetoric, punctuation, spelling, mechanics, and custom and after a while no fallacys. Reveals some authority of the embodied although elevate research would own increased the compute of the column; some important rate although portions of the embodied may be unsettled. Demonstrates success of rhetoric, punctuation, spelling, mechanics, and custom after a while fewer than three fallacysReveals enlightenment of the stuff-stuff stuff although raise research is needed; some important rate was eminent although raise in-profundity perspective would own enhanced the exertion. Understanding of rhetoric, punctuation, spelling, mechanics, and custom after a while fewer than five fallacysMay highlight what the balbutiation embodied offers but does not apportion elevate research of the stuff-stuff stuff; important rate is rare. Correction in some areas of rhetoric, punctuation, spelling, mechanics, and custom; fewer than ten fallacys but retains clarity throughout most of post.Uses singular notion solely after a whileout any research of added possibilities; no important rate is eminent. Needs correction in rhetoric, punctuation, spelling, mechanics, and custom; raise than fifteen fallacys; fallacys assume clarity of column.Unable to charges owing there was no promise in the argument.
Criteria25/25 per column22/ 25 per column20/ 25 per column17/ 25 per column15/ 25 per column0/ 25 per column
Peer Responses (25 per column)Promotes elevate argument on the stuff-stuff stuff through cogitation-provoking mate rejoinders; demonstrates profundity of decomposition of stuff-matter-stuff and mate’s column; fount prop in befitting APA format, rhetoric, punctuation, spelling, mechanics and custom after a while no fallacysPromotes elevate argument on the stuff-stuff stuff through meaningful comments that demonstrate choice of stuff-matter-stuff and mate’s column. Source prop  may not abundantly use befitting APA format, rhetoric, punctuation, spelling, mechanics and custom after a while fewer than three fallacysEngages mates but does not raise elevate compensation of the embodied so that added scholarship takes settle. Source prop may not be knowing or in the alienate APA format, rhetoric, punctuation, spelling, mechanics and custom after a while fewer than five fallacys.Peer promise does not aid profundity of academic cogitation or is inveterate on singular notion solely. Source prop may not be knowing or in the alienate APA format, after a while fewer than ten fallacys in rhetoric, spelling, mechanics and usagePeer rejoinders do not add be or raise promise in the argument in a meaningful way; comments are light or off stuff-matter-matter. Extremely scant or no fount prop eminent; imbefitting or dropping APA format, and rhetoric, spelling, mechanics assume clarityUnable to charges owing there was no promise in the argument.

Professionalism is a very weighty stuff in your online arrange at Keiser University and in the scope of psychology.  Our mission is to prepare you after a while an teaching that prepares you to exceed in the exertionsettle and in furrow programs. Please use the subjoined guidelines in our argument forum and in all despatch at Keiser University:

· I earn “listen” to others deferentially.

· I allow that online scholarship is void of visible cues that frequently prop despatch and earn try to use phraseology that  clearly expresses my views.

· I earn try to husband phraseology that is cogitationful, deferential, and collegial when communicating after a while my companion students.

· When I dissimilate after a while someone, I earn zest his/her ideas in a deferential and circumstantial kind.

· I earn try to discern other people’s behaviors and perspectives rather than solely inspect them.

· I earn shirk stereotypes and fun that is damnatory of others.

· I earn shirk passageing phraseology, jangle, or other non-professional despatch.

                      Who Am I?

Please unravel pages 104-106 for Kohlberg and Gilligan, then pages 98-101 for Erikson's psychocollective tasks at divergent stages of condition. Read pages 465-466 for balbutiations on Suicide

Most of us own asked ourselves the investigation "Who am I?" at one top or another in our speeds. Coon et al.(2019) examine the difficulties teenagers calculateenance in establishing their own identity: "Many problems root from the untransparent standards encircling the role childishs should resemble amid society" (p. 110). Our passage besides explains that teenagers test tortuousness, or untransparent interpretations when defining their roles. This adds to their indistinctness of a transparent and cubic notion of stubborn.

More and raise frequently we are view cases presented in the instrument encircling teens who own taken their own speeds as a end of surly and cybersurly (Wang, 2016). Coon et al. (2019) own argued that youngster is a unruly spell. However, Karen Horney’s assumption explains that basic disquiet occurs owing we speed in a adverse globe.  An model is Wang's fame of a suicide by a 13-year-old virgin in rejoinder to racial and collective unfairness despite perceived sexual orientation. 

How greatly does affecting brawl versus collective hostility compute as an sense for teen suicide? Or is it a coalition of the two?

Drawing upon Kohlberg’s assumption of stages of ideal harvest, Gilligan’s assumption of caring, and Erikson’s psychocollective stages assumption, examine reasons why an childish influence round to suicide. Then, using one of these theories, recommend how to aid a teen who has been a martyr of surly.

References

Coon, D., Mitterer, J.O., & Martini, T. (2019). Introduction to psychology: Gateways to choice and behavior (15th ed.). Cengage Learning.

Wang, Y. (2016). After years of alleged surly, an Ohio teen killed herself. Is her discipline environs under obligation? The Washington Post. Retrieved from https://www.washingtonpost.co

Order a unique copy of this paper
(550 words)

Approximate price: $22

Basic features
  • Free title page and bibliography
  • Unlimited revisions
  • Plagiarism-free guarantee
  • Money-back guarantee
  • 24/7 support
On-demand options
  • Writer’s samples
  • Part-by-part delivery
  • Overnight delivery
  • Copies of used sources
  • Expert Proofreading
Paper format
  • 275 words per page
  • 12 pt Arial/Times New Roman
  • Double line spacing
  • Any citation style (APA, MLA, Chicago/Turabian, Harvard)

Our guarantees

Delivering a high-quality product at a reasonable price is not enough anymore.
That’s why we have developed 5 beneficial guarantees that will make your experience with our service enjoyable, easy, and safe.

Money-back guarantee

You have to be 100% sure of the quality of your product to give a money-back guarantee. This describes us perfectly. Make sure that this guarantee is totally transparent.

Read more

Zero-plagiarism guarantee

Each paper is composed from scratch, according to your instructions. It is then checked by our plagiarism-detection software. There is no gap where plagiarism could squeeze in.

Read more

Free-revision policy

Thanks to our free revisions, there is no way for you to be unsatisfied. We will work on your paper until you are completely happy with the result.

Read more

Privacy policy

Your email is safe, as we store it according to international data protection rules. Your bank details are secure, as we use only reliable payment systems.

Read more

Fair-cooperation guarantee

By sending us your money, you buy the service we provide. Check out our terms and conditions if you prefer business talks to be laid out in official language.

Read more

Calculate the price of your order

550 words
We'll send you the first draft for approval by September 11, 2018 at 10:52 AM
Total price:
$26
The price is based on these factors:
Academic level
Number of pages
Urgency