1) Transcribe down the earliest three tramps of the philosophical way. Judge of a wide subject that you are careful in and which would fashion a cheerful sociological con-over—for in, ethnic variation in a garden, homecoming rituals, stalwart scholarships, or teen driving. Now, obtain?} that subject through the earliest tramps of the order. For each tramp, transcribe a few sentences or a paragraph: 1) Ask a interrogation environing the subject. 2) Do some elimination and transcribe down the titles of some catechism or books you’d absence to decipher environing the subject. 3) Formulate a supposition.

2) Imagine you are environing to do ground elimination in a inequitable situate for a set season. Instead of judgeing environing the subject of con-over itself, attend how you, as the eliminationer, conquer feel to qualify for the con-over. What separate, gregarious, and tangible sacrifices conquer you feel to fashion? 

5) Why do you judge the ASA crafted such a constructive set of intellectual principles? What stamp of con-over could put rational participants at facilitate? 

6) Would you conqueringly share in a sociological con-over that could theoretically put your bloom and security at facilitate, but had the undeveloped to succor thousands or level hundreds of thousands of persons? For in, would you share in a con-over of a new refuse that could heal diabetes or cancer, level if it meant protracted disturb and tangible disquiet for you or potential beaming injury?