Stakeholder Identification

rubric 

CriteriaFar Above StandardsAbove StandardsMeets StandardsBelow StandardsWell Below StandardsCriterion ScoreStakeholder Identification Identification of a logical stakeholder based on the case study Generally, 1 point per stakeholder10 points

9-10 Points

10 stakeholders correctly identified a derived from the case study.

8.5 points

8.5 Points

10 stakeholders correctly identified from the case study or logical assumptions.

7.5 points

 7.5 Points

Minimum of 8 stakeholders correctly identified from the case study or logical assumptions. 

6.5 points

6-7 Points

Fewer than 8 stakeholders correctly identified from the case study or logical assumptions; and/or contains significant incorrect information.

0 points

0-5 Points

Content missing or extremely incomplete, did not reflect the assignment instructions, showed little or no originality, demonstrated little effort, is not supported with information from the Case Study; and/or is not original work for this class section.

/ 10To-Be Process Analysis Analysis describes how the system will support the new hiring process. Generally, 0-3 points per to-be process step. Both quantity and quality evaluated.30 points

27-30 Points

To-Be Process step improvements clearly relate to corresponding As-Is Process step and fully explain how the system will support it; demonstrates sophisticated analysis.

25 points

24-26 Points

To-Be Process step improvements relate to corresponding As-Is Process step and explain how the system will support it; demonstrates effective analysis.

22 points

21-23 Points

To-Be Process step improvements provided for each As-Is Process step and an explanation is provided for each

19 points

18-20 Points

Fewer than 10 To-Be Process step improvements and/or explanations are provided; and/or contains significant incorrect information.

0 points

0-17 Points

Content missing or extremely incomplete, did not reflect the assignment instructions, showed little or no originality, demonstrated little effort, is not supported with information from the Case Study; and/or is not original work for this class section.

/ 30Business Benefits of Improved Process Explains how each step in the process can contribute to the overall business strategy. Generally, 0-2 point per improved process step. Both quantity and quality evaluated.20 points

18-20 Points

Business benefits for all 10 process steps are fully explained; demonstrates sophisticated analysis.

17 points

16-17 Points

Business benefits for all 10 process steps are explained; demonstrates effective analysis.

15 points

14-15 Points

Business benefits for all 10 process steps are included. 

13 points

12-13 Points

Business benefits for fewer than 10 process steps are provided; and/or contains significant incorrect information.

0 points

0-11 Points

Content missing or extremely incomplete, did not reflect the assignment instructions, showed little or no originality, demonstrated little effort, is not supported with information from the Case Study; and/or is not original work for this class section.

/ 20Expected Improvements Issues from case study and improvements due to technology in areas of Communication, Workflow, and Relationships. Generally, 0-7 points per area. Both quantity and quality evaluated.20 points

18-20 Points

Issues and improvements for all 3 areas are fully and correctly explained; demonstrates sophisticated analysis.

17 points

16-17 Points

Issues and improvements for all 3 areas are explained; demonstrates effective analysis.

15 points

14-15 Points

Issues and improvements for all 3 areas are provided.

13 points

12-13 Points

Issues and improvements for fewer than 3 areas are provided; and/or contains significant incorrect information.

0 points

0-11 Points

Content missing or extremely incomplete, did not reflect the assignment instructions, showed little or no originality, demonstrated little effort, is not supported with information from the Case Study; and/or is not original work for this class section.

/ 20Research Two or more sources–one source from within the IFSM 300 course content and one external (other than the course materials)10 points

9-10 Points

Required resources are incorporated and used effectively. Sources used are relevant and timely and contribute strongly to the analysis.  References are appropriately incorporated and cited using APA style

8.5 points

8.5 Points

At least two sources are incorporated and are relevant and somewhat support the analysis. References are appropriately incorporated and cited using APA style

7.5 points

7.5 Points

Only one resource is used and properly incorporated and/or reference(s) lack correct APA style.

6.5 points

6.5 Points

A source may be used, but is not properly incorporated or used, and/or is not effective or appropriate; and/or does not follow APA style for references and citations

0 points

0-5 Points

No course content or external research incorporated; or reference listed is not cited within the text.

/ 10Format Uses outline format provided; includes Title Page and Reference Page10 points

9-10 Points

Well organized and easy to read.  Very few or no errors in sentence structure, grammar, and spelling; double-spaced, written in third person and presented in a professional format.

8.5 points

8.5 Points

Effective organization; has few errors in sentence structure, grammar, and spelling; double-spaced, written in third person and presented in a professional format.

7.5 points

7.5 Points

Some organization; may have some errors in sentence structure, grammar and spelling. Report is double spaced and written in third person.

6.5 points

6.5 Points

Not well organized, and/or contains several grammar and/or spelling errors; and/or is not double-spaced and written in third person. 

0 points

0-5 Points

Extremely poorly written, has many grammar and/or spelling errors, or does not convey the information.

/ 10Rubric Total ScoreTotal/ 100

Order a unique copy of this paper
(550 words)

Approximate price: $22

Basic features
  • Free title page and bibliography
  • Unlimited revisions
  • Plagiarism-free guarantee
  • Money-back guarantee
  • 24/7 support
On-demand options
  • Writer’s samples
  • Part-by-part delivery
  • Overnight delivery
  • Copies of used sources
  • Expert Proofreading
Paper format
  • 275 words per page
  • 12 pt Arial/Times New Roman
  • Double line spacing
  • Any citation style (APA, MLA, Chicago/Turabian, Harvard)

Our guarantees

Delivering a high-quality product at a reasonable price is not enough anymore.
That’s why we have developed 5 beneficial guarantees that will make your experience with our service enjoyable, easy, and safe.

Money-back guarantee

You have to be 100% sure of the quality of your product to give a money-back guarantee. This describes us perfectly. Make sure that this guarantee is totally transparent.

Read more

Zero-plagiarism guarantee

Each paper is composed from scratch, according to your instructions. It is then checked by our plagiarism-detection software. There is no gap where plagiarism could squeeze in.

Read more

Free-revision policy

Thanks to our free revisions, there is no way for you to be unsatisfied. We will work on your paper until you are completely happy with the result.

Read more

Privacy policy

Your email is safe, as we store it according to international data protection rules. Your bank details are secure, as we use only reliable payment systems.

Read more

Fair-cooperation guarantee

By sending us your money, you buy the service we provide. Check out our terms and conditions if you prefer business talks to be laid out in official language.

Read more

Calculate the price of your order

550 words
We'll send you the first draft for approval by September 11, 2018 at 10:52 AM
Total price:
$26
The price is based on these factors:
Academic level
Number of pages
Urgency