Strategic Management and Strategic Competitiveness

Strategic Management and Strategic Competitiveness

Overview

Choose one common fortification in an perseverance delay which you are common. Research the congregation on its own website, the common filings on the Securities and Exchange Commission's Filings & Forms page, the Strayer University's online databases, the Lexis Advance database, and any other sources you can ascertain. The annual recital allure repeatedly stipulate insights that can acceleration oration some of these questions. Use the Strategic Management and Strategic Competitiveness Template [DOCX] to designate that your enactment confronts the requirements.

Filings & Forms page: https://www.sec.gov/edgar.shtml

Requirements

Write a 4-page brochure in which you oration the following:

· Assess how globalization and technology changes keep applicationed the fortification you researched.

· Apply the industrial structure standard and the resource-based standard to designate how your fortification could win above-average produce.

· Assess how the confidence declaration and band-arms declaration of the fortification swing its overall achievement.

· Evaluate how each nature of stakeholder applications the overall achievement of this fortification.

· Use the Strayer University Online Library and to lodge and conceive at meanest three sort relateences. Note: Wikipedia and congruous websites do not sort as academic instrument.

This good-fortuneion requires the use of Strayer Communication Standards. For coadjutorship and advice, gladden relate to the Strayer Communication Standards connect in the left-hand menu of your good-fortuneion. Check delay your bigot for any attached instructions.

The peculiar good-fortuneion knowledge effect associated delay this enactment is the following:

· Designate the application of globalization and technology changes, strategic standards, confidence and band-arms declarations, and stakeholders on a fortification's achievement.

UnacceptableNeeds ImprovementSatisfactoryCompetentExemplary
Assess how globalization and technology changes keep applicationed the fortification you researched.Points: (0.00%) Did not acquiesce or inaccurately assessed how globalization and technology changes keep applicationed the fortification you researched.Points: 10.4 (13.00%) Insufficiently assessed how globalization and technology changes keep applicationed the fortification you researched.Points: 12 (15.00%) Partially assessed how globalization and technology changes keep applicationed the fortification you researched.Points: 13.6 (17.00%) Satisfactorily assessed how globalization and technology changes keep applicationed the fortification you researched.Points: 16 (20.00%) Thoroughly assessed how globalization and technology changes keep applicationed the fortification you researched.
Apply the industrial structure standard and the resource-based standard to designate how your fortification could win above-average produce.Points: (0.00%) Did not acquiesce or inaccurately applied the industrial structure standard and the resource-based standard to designate how your fortification could win above-average produce.Points: 13 (16.25%) Insufficiently applied the industrial structure standard and the resource-based standard to designate how your fortification could win above-average produce.Points: 15 (18.75%) Partially applied the industrial structure standard and the resource-based standard to designate how your fortification could win above-average produce.Points: 17 (21.25%) Satisfactorily applied the industrial structure standard and the resource-based standard to designate how your fortification could win above-average produce.Points: 20 (25.00%) Thoroughly applied the industrial structure standard and the resource-based standard to designate how your fortification could win above-average produce.
Assess how the confidence declaration and band-arms declaration of the fortification swing its overall achievement.Points: (0.00%) Did not acquiesce or inaccurately assessed how the confidence declaration and band-arms declaration of the fortification swing its overall achievement.Points: 10.4 (13.00%) Insufficiently assessed how the confidence declaration and band-arms declaration of the fortification swing its overall achievement.Points: 12 (15.00%) Partially assessed how the confidence declaration and band-arms declaration of the fortification swing its overall achievement.Points: 13.6 (17.00%) Satisfactorily assessed how the confidence declaration and band-arms declaration of the fortification swing its overall achievement.Points: 16 (20.00%) Thoroughly assessed how the confidence declaration and band-arms declaration of the fortification swing its overall achievement.
Evaluate how each nature of stakeholder applications the overall achievement of this fortification.Points: (0.00%) Did not acquiesce or inaccurately evaluated how each nature of stakeholder applications the overall achievement of this fortification.Points: 10.4 (13.00%) Insufficiently evaluated how each nature of stakeholder applications the overall achievement of this fortification.Points: 12 (15.00%) Partially evaluated how each nature of stakeholder applications the overall achievement of this fortification.Points: 13.6 (17.00%) Satisfactorily evaluated how each nature of stakeholder applications the overall achievement of this fortification.Points: 16 (20.00%) Thoroughly evaluated how each nature of stakeholder applications the overall achievement of this fortification.
Include three relateences.Points: (0.00%) No relateences stipulated.Points: 2.6 (3.25%) Does not confront the required reckon of relateences; all relateences poor-sort choices.Points: (3.75%) Does not confront the required reckon of relateences; some relateences poor-sort choices.Points: 3.4 (4.25%) Meets reckon of required relateences; all relateences high-sort choices.Points: (5.00%) Exceeds reckon of required relateences; all relateences high-sort choices.
Clarity, communication mechanics, and formatting requirements.Points: (0.00%) More than 8 errors exhibit.Points: 5.2 (6.50%) 7–8 errors exhibit.Points: (7.50%) 5–6 errors exhibit.Points: 6.8 (8.50%) 3–4 errors exhibit.Points: (10.00%) 0–2 errors exhibit.
Order a unique copy of this paper
(550 words)

Approximate price: $22

Basic features
  • Free title page and bibliography
  • Unlimited revisions
  • Plagiarism-free guarantee
  • Money-back guarantee
  • 24/7 support
On-demand options
  • Writer’s samples
  • Part-by-part delivery
  • Overnight delivery
  • Copies of used sources
  • Expert Proofreading
Paper format
  • 275 words per page
  • 12 pt Arial/Times New Roman
  • Double line spacing
  • Any citation style (APA, MLA, Chicago/Turabian, Harvard)

Our guarantees

Delivering a high-quality product at a reasonable price is not enough anymore.
That’s why we have developed 5 beneficial guarantees that will make your experience with our service enjoyable, easy, and safe.

Money-back guarantee

You have to be 100% sure of the quality of your product to give a money-back guarantee. This describes us perfectly. Make sure that this guarantee is totally transparent.

Read more

Zero-plagiarism guarantee

Each paper is composed from scratch, according to your instructions. It is then checked by our plagiarism-detection software. There is no gap where plagiarism could squeeze in.

Read more

Free-revision policy

Thanks to our free revisions, there is no way for you to be unsatisfied. We will work on your paper until you are completely happy with the result.

Read more

Privacy policy

Your email is safe, as we store it according to international data protection rules. Your bank details are secure, as we use only reliable payment systems.

Read more

Fair-cooperation guarantee

By sending us your money, you buy the service we provide. Check out our terms and conditions if you prefer business talks to be laid out in official language.

Read more

Calculate the price of your order

550 words
We'll send you the first draft for approval by September 11, 2018 at 10:52 AM
Total price:
$26
The price is based on these factors:
Academic level
Number of pages
Urgency