Week 5 phi445 | Human Resource Management homework help

Required Resources

Text

Fieser, J. (2015). [Electronic avowment]. Retrieved from https://content.ashford.edu/

  • Chapter 5: Shrewdness in the Workplace
  • Chapter 6: Employees

Ashford Inaugurate Materials

Hardy, J, Foster, C., & Zúñiga y Postigo, G. (2015). Preapprehension the munimentView in a new window. In With cheerful-tempered-natured-natured argue: A pilot to accurate deeming. Retrieved from https://content.ashford.edu/

  • Section 9.1: The Close Diatribe is a idiosyncraticity of Stipulation 9 of the prefatory inaugurate in logic citationbook that is occupied in the PHI103 Informal Logic inaugurate offered at Ashford University. The amalgamate for this spring earn capture you to a PDF constituteat of this stipulation. Individuality 9.1 conduct-ins the topic and antecedent in an close diatribe, which are elements that learners in this inaugurate must performance in twain ordinances in this inaugurate.

Hardy, J, Foster, C., & Zúñiga y Postigo, G. (2015). Preapprehension the munimentView in a new window. In With cheerful-tempered-natured-natured argue: A pilot to accurate deeming. Retrieved from https://content.ashford.edu/

  • Section 9.2: Strengthening the Close Diatribe is a idiosyncraticity of Stipulation 9 of the prefatory inaugurate in logic citationbook that is occupied in the PHI103 Informal Logic inaugurate offered at Ashford University. The amalgamate for this spring earn capture you to a PDF constituteat of this stipulation. For the purposes of the labor for this week, it earn be indispensoperative to interpret singly thesubindividuality denominated Clarification and Support. This subindividuality bright-ups the skin of livelihood claimed in an close diatribe for the claims offered in its antecedent, which learners in this inaugurate must know-repeatedly in dispose to devote in discourses and twain ordinances.

Hardy, J, Foster, C., & Zúñiga y Postigo, G. (2015). Preapprehension the munimentView in a new window. In With cheerful-tempered-natured-natured argue: A pilot to accurate deeming. Retrieved from https://content.ashford.edu/

  • Section 9.4: Confronting Disagreement is a idiosyncraticity of Stipulation 9 of the prefatory inaugurate in logic citationbook that is occupied in the PHI103 Informal Logic inaugurate offered at Ashford University. The amalgamate for this spring earn capture you to a PDF constituteat of this stipulation. Individuality 9.4 cloaks the conclusive motive of passion, which is a motive that learners in this inaugurate must performance in their analyses for discourses and ordinances.

Zúñiga y Postigo, G. (2015). Preapprehension the munimentView in a new window [PowerPoint Slides].

  • This PowerPoint muniment cloaks the deep characteristics of utilitarianism, deontology, and strength ethics, and what is the spiritual cheerful-tempered-natured-natured in each of these.

Articles

Collins, C., & Sokolowski, J. (2015, June 12). [Blog maintenance]. Retrieved from http://www.laboremploymentlawblog.com/2015/06/articles/discrimination/supreme-court-sides-with-eeoc-in-abercrombie-fitch-hijab-case/

. 575 U. S. 1 (2015). Retrieved from http://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/14pdf/14-86_p86b.pdf

  • This is the Supreme Court’s sentence on this contingency, delivered by Justice Scalia, and it conceives the singly dissenting adjudication by Justice Thomas.

Geller, P. (2015, June 2). Retrieved from http://www.breitbart.com/national-security/2015/06/02/why-would-a-devout-muslim-want-to-work-at-abercrombie-and-fitch/

Olson, W. (2015, June 1). . Retrieved from http://www.cato.org/blog/eeoc-v-abercrombie-headscarfs-judicial-modesty

  • This date studys the shortcomings and risks of this Supreme Court sentence.
    Accessibility Statement does not continue.
    Privacy Plan does not continue.

. (2015, June 3). The Economist. Retrieved from http://www.economist.com/blogs/democracyinamerica/2015/06/religion-workplace

Zakrzewski, K. (2005). . U. Pa. Record of Labor and Encroachment Law, 7(2), 431-461. Retrieved from https://www.law.upenn.edu/journals/jbl/articles/volume7/issue2/Zakrzewski7U.Pa.J.Lab.&Emp.L.431%282005%29.pdf

  • This date studys the role of arrival in hiring sentences.

Multimedia

Wall Street Journal. (2015, June 3). [Video ameliorate]. Retrieved from https://youtu.be/lhePN3HMHxI

Discrimination Laws: Advantages and Disadvantages for twain Employees and Business

This disline ordinance requires you to surrender at smallest immodest maintenances: an moderate maintenance, two replication maintenances to correlative learners in threads other than your own, and a amendd maintenance.

Prepare.png

Prepare: In your original maintenance in this discourse, you earn gline common after a opportunityliness the contingency of Abercrombie & Fitch by resources of the misspend symbolical in the Required Resources this week. Tnear is too a unfair instrument lineament located at the end of Individuality 5.3 of the citationbook titled Workplace Discrimination: Abercrombie & Fitch. In dispose to be easy for this exercisement, you earn claim to accomplished the required interpretings and instrument rolled.

Reflect.png

Reflect: Tnear are two plans to judge in the Abercrombie & Fitch contingency. On the one exercisementman, we possess the job solicitor’s plan. She went to the job conference grooveing a hijab. The conferenceer did not comment on the hijab, and the solicitor too did not tend that her pious beliefs required her to groove a hijab. She was rearwards not compensated fixed on the underneathstanding that her arrival was irreconciloperative after a opportunityliness the society’s appear plan. For issue, caps are not unconditional and the courageous sales associates (referred to as “models” in the society’s urbane speech) are regularly shirthither and in sweatpants in dispose to compose the avow at the stores for the aesthetic for which Abercrombie & Fitch has gline know-againn: infantine, preppy, and hormonally pregnant. When she was notified that she was not compensated for the lie, she ameliorated a discontent after a opportunityliness the Equal Encroachment Occasion Commission that, in revolve, ameliorated a lawsuit on her bestead alleging a violation of Title VII.

On the other exercisementman, we possess Abercrombie & Fitch’s plan. As a society doing profession in the United States, Abercrombie & Fitch is legally unconditional to rent those performanceees who fit its appear plan. This is no opposed from the appear capacitys for the Dallas Cowboys Cheerleaders, the Chicago Bulls, the New York City Ballet society, or for jockeys compensated by drasticbred owners to line them at the Kentucky Derby. In all of these contingencys, tnear are tallness, magnitude, and other appear capacitys for performancement that are exactified by the subject-matter claims and aesthetics of the lie. She was set-up to be fitted for the job but her garb was palpably in battle after a opportunityliness Abercrombie & Fitch’s appear plan. Yet, the job petitioner know-againingly sought performancement at this retailer.

According to the law, should a peculiar grace be required due to a pious performance, then Title VII dictates that the appear capacitys communicate way to the pious capacity in dispose not to be judgeed an act of pious shrewdness.

The EEOC prevailed in the District Court, but this adjudication was reversed by the Tenth Circuit on the premise that miscarryure-to-accommodate obligation singly attaches when a job solicitor yields the feasible performanceer after a opportunityliness know-againledge of the claim for an grace due to pious performance. Once it reached the Supreme Court, the sentence was made in countenance of the job solicitor. According to Justice Scalia,

Title VII does not claim uninfluenced indifference after a opportunityliness heed to pious performances—that they be useed no worse than other performances. Rather, it communicates them countenanceed tenor, affirmatively obligating performanceers not “to miscarry or recrement to rent or send-away any idiosyncratic . . . consequently of such idiosyncratic’s” “pious celebration and performance.” An performanceer is certainly entitled to possess, for issue, a no headgroove plan as an settled substance. But when an petitioner requires an grace as an “aspec[t] of pious . . . performance,” it is no apology that the aftercited “fail[ure] . . . to rent” was due to an otherwise-impartial plan. Title VII requires otherwise-impartial policies to communicate way to the claim for an grace.

The singly dissenting adjudication was that of Justice Thomas who wrote:

Mere collision of a impartial plan cannot bring-about “intentional shrewdness.”…I would await that Abercrombie’s inaugurate did not bring-about “intentional shrewdness.” Abercrombie recrementd to compose an separation to its impartial Appear Plan for Samantha Elauf ’s pious performance of grooveing a headscarf… In doing so, it did not use pious performances hither countenanceably than concordant unmonastic performances, but instead remained impartial after a opportunityliness heed to pious performances…Resisting this sincere collision of §1981a, the seniority expands the signification of “intentional shrewdness” to conceive a disapproval to communicate a pious petitioner “favored tenor.”…But incompatible to the seniority’s conviction, this innovating assumption of shrewdness is not commanded by the misspend statutory citation.

Write.png

Write: In the original bisect of your moderate maintenance, you earn claim to conduct-in the Abercrombie & Fitch lawsuit. In this vestibule, you earn too claim to (1) articulate the freedoms that companies in the United States possess communicaten our relatively-free trade plan and (2) present the Title VII regulations about performancement shrewdness. These earn yield the elucidation for you to be operative to study how the nation’s laws influence the hiring performances of Abercrombie & Fitch and other companies whose hiring plan conceives a subject-matter aesthetic for performanceees.

In the fly bisect of your moderate maintenance, present your decomposture of this contingency in a way that identifies which entities (Abercrombie & Fitch as a fortification, the economic plan in the USA, the regulatory coerce of the avow, or all of these) possess a role in the height that led to the lawsuit underneathneath demonstration. In your decomposition, you must assess the straightforward or denying property of the interplay among profession temper and one of the aftercited: the free-trade plan, advertising, hiring regulations, or urbane gregarious obligation. Your centre must be an religions decomposture of this interplay. Be certain to palpably demonstrate the religions assumption that you are devoteing in your decomposition, and to livelihood your decomposture by relioperative and/or erudite springs.

Discuss.png

Revise: Interpret the feedtail yieldd by your confessor to your moderate maintenance, either at-once to you or to your correlative learners. Use this as an occasion to collect from your confessor, specially after a opportunityliness heed to the best ways to devote the inaugurate symbolical and your inquiry to your decomposition. On the foundation of what you possess collected in this way, maintenance an ameliorated species of your moderate maintenance that applies the joined know-againledge that you possess gained.

Remember that your remove depends on the capacity of your moderate and amendd apologys, not exact on the yielding of an invasion at increase. It is thus to your custom to maintenance the best moderate maintenance you can and then to too ameliorate that best exertion as greatly as you can through species.

Requirements for Your Moderate Post:

  • Your moderate maintenance should be at smallest 350 engagements in prolixity and possess citations and references in APA notation. It should adgarb the active in its sum. This resources that you should not rend your apology to the active in multiple maintenances. Your demonstration should be twain drastic and compendious. This is a co-operation that claims date and judgment, so communicate yourself equal date to draw and amend.
  • Please be advised that until you maintenance, you earn not see what your correlative learners are maintenanceing. Once you surrender your maintenance, you earn be operative to apprehension the maintenances from your other classmates. You can then receipts to replication to at smallest two opposed threads fixed on the required symbolical for this discourse.
  • Your roll of references for your moderate maintenance should conceive not singly the video and the other required symbolical for this discourse, as courteous-behaved-behaved as the Instructor Guidance and any other announcements presented to you by your confessor. Use all of the symbolical presented to you in the inaugurate and by your confessor, in attention to any other springs that you consulted to notify yourself about this contingency (but not Wikipedia or concordant springs).
  • Your moderate maintenance for this disline should be surrenderted no later than the end of Thursday (11:59 pm, U.S. Mountain date).

Requirements for Replies to Other Threads:

  • At smallest two of the immodest maintenances required should be in the constitute of replies to correlative classmates in threads other than your own.
  • Each of your replies should be at smallest 200 engagements, and notifyed by the inaugurate symbolical. As such, the replies must possess citations and references in APA notation. Your roll of references for each replication should conceive all of the inaugurate symbolical that has notifyed your replication, in attention to any inquiry that you possess obtained on your own.
  • Your replies should centre on the unfair demonstration presented by your correlative learner and these should conceive an demonstration of whether or not the characteristics of the religions assumption and/or economic plan were attested courteous-behaved, and whether or not their collision and decomposture was too carried out successfully. Providing such an demonstration is not an invasion on your correlative learner but an invasion to labor concomitantly after a opportunityliness your correlative learner inland the better underneathstanding of the religions theories occupied, as courteous-behaved-behaved as their collision.

Requirements for Revising Your Moderate Post:

  • Submit a species of your moderate maintenance by either replicationing to your own maintenance, or to the feedtail yieldd to you by your confessor.
  • Tnear is no reserve engagement capacity for your amendd moderate maintenance. But you should regularly bright-up the argues for revising your maintenance so that it is bright what you are doing. If you are revising singly a few engagements, or an religions assumption, you should fly surrendering a maintenance after a opportunityliness uncertain speech.As it has been peaked out in each of the departed weeks, it is main to know-repeatedly that no one can interpret your opinion so you claim to yield the elucidation for your species (Why? What activeed it? What inaugurate symbolical notifyed you?), and it is main to transcribe in bright speech and accomplished sentences.
  • Your amendd moderate maintenance is your haphazard to amend any balancesights or faults in your moderate maintenance, or demonstration your ameliorated underneathstanding of the symbolical and its collisions to the contingency at exercisementman. You may, for issue, conclude to the event that another religions assumption is better than the one that you moderately chose. Accordingly, your species should evince that you chose another religions assumption and an explication why you invent the regaining past eligible. You may too invent the claim to amend any misspend portions of your decomposition. Or, you potentiality possess realized that your falsification did not capture into playation main factors indispensoperative for your evaluation of the residence.
  • You should maximize the increase of your moderate maintenance by performanceing your confessor’s feedtail as a pilot. Keep in opinion that you may not regularly transfer straightforward feedtail from your confessor. But your confessor earn possess surrenderted feedtail in the disline to other maintenances. Interpret your confessor’s feedtail whether it is orationed to you at-once or to other correlative learners. This earn communicate you greatly to deem about and devote to your own maintenance.
  • If your confessor or a correlative classmate responds to your amendd moderate maintenance, and on this foundation, you invent cheerful-tempered-natured-natured argue to surrender yet another species, then by all resources do so. The past you ameliorate your moderate maintenance, the past you earn good-natured-natured twain in provisions of your collecting and most mitigated your remove.

Argumentative Essay

In the Week Three Assignment, you intent in a contingency decomposture of a popular profession height using some of the components of an close diatribe. In this written ordinance, you earn transcribe a accomplished close diatribe as pictorial in Sections 9.1 and 9.2 of With Good-natured Reason: A Pilot to Accurate Thinking (Foster, Hardy, & Zúñiga y Postigo, 2015). This diatribe earn conceive a amendd and inabrupt avowment of your Week Three Assignment, an check to your topic, a rebuttal, and hindmost comments. In dispose to good-natured-natured the most, you should rouse laboring on your Ultimate Project from the date you transfer your Week Three Ordinance tail after a opportunityliness comments from your confessor.

Your ordinance should conceive the aftercited:
A species of your Week Three Contingency Decomposture Assignment. Your species should represent a massive edit of your labor that largely incorporates feedtail from your confessor and goes courteous-behaved-behaved balance amending any positive or APA faults.

The strongest feasible check to your topic. After the ultimate portion of your Week Three Contingency Decomposture Assignment, rouse a new portion that conduct-ins the strongest feasible check to your topic. The judgeations for this are subject-mattered in Individuality 9.2 of With Good-natured Reason: A Pilot to Accurate Thinking (Hardy, Foster, & Zúñiga y Postigo, 2015). Bring-about certain to performance the misspend speech to conduct-in the check, such as “some may sight to my topic as thrives” or “according to [so and so] the topic presented near miscarrys to playation for X” [whatever he or she invents heightatic]. You can invent other speech to do this, of inaugurate, but the key top near is to bring-about certain that you evince that someone else is expressive when presenting this check.

It is too main to recollect that you do inquiry to find cheerful-tempered-natured-natured checks and not uninfluencedly checks that are oft and thus largely rebutted. Appear for peer-reviewed record dates in the Ashford University Library, full-citation dates in Google Scholar, or dates in the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Present the despite lie fairly and in subject-matter. This may capture past than one portion.

A rebuttal. This is a refutation of the check that you possess exact presented. Rouse this in a new portion aftercited the check portion(s). Once repeatedly, thrive the indications of Individuality 9.2 of With Good-natured Reason: A Pilot to Accurate Thinking (Hardy, Foster, & Zúñiga y Postigo, 2015). You may top out an fault in the check. Or you may demonstration that, opportunityliness it is an main check, it does not devote squarely to your reasoning, or does not playation for basis that bring-about it inappropriate. Above all, bring-about certain to deeptain conclusive decorum in your rebuttal. Inland this end, you should devote the motives of passion and of faultlessness, original conduct-ind in the Week One inaugurate symbolical. See “Confronting Disagreement” in Individuality 9.4 of With Good-natured Reason: A Pilot to Accurate Thinking (Hardy, Foster, & Zúñiga y Postigo, 2015).

Closing comments. End your close diatribe after a opportunityliness a portion of failure comments. Yield some returnions of what you possess invasioned to terminate by resources of your diatribe. You could, for issue, bright-up how your diatribe sheds capricious on the broader disputation that it orationes. Or you could top out how your diatribe orationes a regularly ignored top or the unpopular plan in the disputation. You could too return on the allied substances in the broader disputation that would be available to study by others. Do not uninfluencedly condense what you possess executed in the mass of your diatribe, and do not add new notifyation near that would livelihood or contravene your diatribe since the mass of your diatribe should possess orationed all the misspend tops. See “Closing Your Essay” in Individuality 9.2 of With Good-natured Reason: A Pilot to Accurate Thinking (Hardy, Foster, & Zúñiga y Postigo (2015).

Requirements for your Assignment:

  • Your ordinance should be among 1500 to 1700 engagements in prolixity, excluding the cloak and references pages.
  • Your demonstration should be twain drastic and compendious. This is a co-operation that claims date and judgment, so communicate yourself equal date to draw and amend.
  • Your ordinance should conceive citations, as courteous-behaved-behaved as a roll of references. Twain must be in APA constitute.
  • Your references should conceive at smallest immodest peer-reviewed dates in attention to those that you earn be carrying balance from our Week Three Contingency Decomposture Assignment. These references should be drawn from the Ashford University Library, Google Scholar, or the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Order a unique copy of this paper
(550 words)

Approximate price: $22

Basic features
  • Free title page and bibliography
  • Unlimited revisions
  • Plagiarism-free guarantee
  • Money-back guarantee
  • 24/7 support
On-demand options
  • Writer’s samples
  • Part-by-part delivery
  • Overnight delivery
  • Copies of used sources
  • Expert Proofreading
Paper format
  • 275 words per page
  • 12 pt Arial/Times New Roman
  • Double line spacing
  • Any citation style (APA, MLA, Chicago/Turabian, Harvard)

Our guarantees

Delivering a high-quality product at a reasonable price is not enough anymore.
That’s why we have developed 5 beneficial guarantees that will make your experience with our service enjoyable, easy, and safe.

Money-back guarantee

You have to be 100% sure of the quality of your product to give a money-back guarantee. This describes us perfectly. Make sure that this guarantee is totally transparent.

Read more

Zero-plagiarism guarantee

Each paper is composed from scratch, according to your instructions. It is then checked by our plagiarism-detection software. There is no gap where plagiarism could squeeze in.

Read more

Free-revision policy

Thanks to our free revisions, there is no way for you to be unsatisfied. We will work on your paper until you are completely happy with the result.

Read more

Privacy policy

Your email is safe, as we store it according to international data protection rules. Your bank details are secure, as we use only reliable payment systems.

Read more

Fair-cooperation guarantee

By sending us your money, you buy the service we provide. Check out our terms and conditions if you prefer business talks to be laid out in official language.

Read more

Calculate the price of your order

550 words
We'll send you the first draft for approval by September 11, 2018 at 10:52 AM
Total price:
$26
The price is based on these factors:
Academic level
Number of pages
Urgency