Week 8 assignment: journal | Applied Sciences homework help

Week 8 Assignment: Journal

Submit Assignment

  • Due Saturday by 11:59pm
  • Points 35
  • Submitting a rasp upload

Required Resources
Read/reconsideration the subjoined resources for this distillation:

  • Textbook: Chapter 16
  • Lesson

Introduction
Remember – these register interrogations exact more judgeing than letter. Judge environing precisely what you are asked to do, and then transcribe as economically as practicable. 

Instructions

  • Critical Thinking
    • Go tail to your very principal register minute – reconsideration your specification of precarious judgeing. After studying precarious judgeing for the elapsed view weeks, would you transmute your specification in any way? If yes, how and why? If no – if it was blamenear – what competency of the passage were best reflected in your specification?
  • Heart of the Matter
    • Recall in your principal register minute that you discussed the authors' announcement that the concepts in Chapters 12, 13 and 14 were "the feeling of the stuff." After having premeditated those chapters, acceptance commonly, delay untarnished brains, the interrogation posed there: Why do you judge the authors perceive these concepts great to precarious judgeing?
  • Ethical Decision-Making
    • The dissertation claims that an reasoning is no amiable intrinsic it has a "fortified and reasoned ethical deep." Do you concur that ethics is an innate part of a amiable reasoning? If yes, why? If no, why not?
  • Looking Forward
    • Do you judge that you now understand everything you insufficiency to understand environing precarious judgeing – or is knowledge to judge precariously a life-long function? Explain your acceptance.

Writing Requirements (APA format)

  • Length: 2-3 pages (not including heading page or references page)
  • 1-inch margins
  • Double spaced
  • 12-point Times New Roman font
  • Title page
  • References page

Grading
This distillation succeed be graded using the Register Grading Rubric.

Course Outcomes (CO): 1, 3, 4, 6

Due Date: By 11:59 p.m. MT on Saturday

Rubric

Journal Grading Rubric - 35 ptsJournal Grading Rubric - 35 ptsCriteriaRatingsPtsThis trutination is linked to a Knowledge OutcomeLength5.0 ptsMeets protraction exactment0.0 ptsDoes not unite protraction exactment5.0 pts
This trutination is linked to a Knowledge OutcomeContent Reflection15.0 ptsReflection demonstrates a haughty extent of precarious judgeing in applying, analyzing, and evaluating key career concepts and theories from readings, dissertations, resources, discussions activities, and/or assignments. Insightful and bearing connections made through contextual explanations, inferences, and examples.12.75 ptsReflection demonstrates some extent of precarious judgeing in applying, analyzing, and/or evaluating key career concepts and theories from readings, dissertations, resources, discussions activities, and/or assignments. Connections made through explanations, inferences, and/or examples.11.25 ptsReflection demonstrates poor precarious judgeing in applying, analyzing, and/or evaluating key career concepts and theories from readings, dissertations, resources, discussions, activities, and/or assignments. Minimal connections made through explanations, inferences, and/or examples.9.0 ptsReflection lacks precarious judgeing. Superficial connections are made delay key career concepts and career materials, activities, and/or assignments.0.0 ptsLittle or no meditation; copies or repeats passage or dissertation.15.0 pts
This trutination is linked to a Knowledge OutcomePersonal Growth10.0 ptsConveys fortified token of meditation on own product delay a indivisible tally to the self-assessment interrogations posed. Demonstrates momentous indivisible development and awareness of deeper significance through inferences made, examples, courteous patent clear insights, and massive profundity in perceptions and challenges. Synthesizes running experiment into coming implications.8.5 ptsConveys token of meditation on own product delay a indivisible tally to the self-assessment interrogations posed. Demonstrates delectable indivisible development and awareness through some inferences made, examples, insights, and challenges. Some deliberation of the coming implications of running experiment.7.5 ptsConveys poor token of meditation on own product in tally to the self-assessment interrogations posed. Demonstrates near than sufficient indivisible development and awareness through few or simplistic inferences made, examples, insights, and/or challenges that are not courteous patent clear. Minimal deliberation of the coming implications of running experiment.6.0 ptsConveys insufficient token of meditation on own product in tally to the self-assessment interrogations posed. Indivisible development and awareness are not palpable and/or demonstrates a unavowed experiment delay negligible indivisible application. Lacks plenty inferences, examples, indivisible insights and challenges, and/or coming implications are bygone.0.0 ptsNo token of meditation.10.0 pts
This trutination is linked to a Knowledge OutcomeWriting Quality5.0 ptsWell written and plainly unembarrassed using trutination English, characterized by parts of a fortified letter mode and basically unobstructed from expression, punctuation, exercitation, and spelling errors.4.25 ptsAbove mean letter mode and logically unembarrassed using trutination English delay younger errors in expression, punctuation, exercitation, and spelling.3.75 ptsAverage and/or contingent letter mode that is rarely unclear and/or delay some errors in expression, punctuation, exercitation, and spelling.3.0 ptsPoor letter mode scant in trutination English, clarity, expression used, and/or common errors in expression, punctuation, exercitation, and spelling. Needs product.0.0 ptsLacks coherence; errors in expression, exercitation and spelling clash delay readability and brains to momentous extent.

Order a unique copy of this paper
(550 words)

Approximate price: $22

Basic features
  • Free title page and bibliography
  • Unlimited revisions
  • Plagiarism-free guarantee
  • Money-back guarantee
  • 24/7 support
On-demand options
  • Writer’s samples
  • Part-by-part delivery
  • Overnight delivery
  • Copies of used sources
  • Expert Proofreading
Paper format
  • 275 words per page
  • 12 pt Arial/Times New Roman
  • Double line spacing
  • Any citation style (APA, MLA, Chicago/Turabian, Harvard)

Our guarantees

Delivering a high-quality product at a reasonable price is not enough anymore.
That’s why we have developed 5 beneficial guarantees that will make your experience with our service enjoyable, easy, and safe.

Money-back guarantee

You have to be 100% sure of the quality of your product to give a money-back guarantee. This describes us perfectly. Make sure that this guarantee is totally transparent.

Read more

Zero-plagiarism guarantee

Each paper is composed from scratch, according to your instructions. It is then checked by our plagiarism-detection software. There is no gap where plagiarism could squeeze in.

Read more

Free-revision policy

Thanks to our free revisions, there is no way for you to be unsatisfied. We will work on your paper until you are completely happy with the result.

Read more

Privacy policy

Your email is safe, as we store it according to international data protection rules. Your bank details are secure, as we use only reliable payment systems.

Read more

Fair-cooperation guarantee

By sending us your money, you buy the service we provide. Check out our terms and conditions if you prefer business talks to be laid out in official language.

Read more

Calculate the price of your order

550 words
We'll send you the first draft for approval by September 11, 2018 at 10:52 AM
Total price:
$26
The price is based on these factors:
Academic level
Number of pages
Urgency